search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PWI | Q&A


PWI hook height optimization with Rigidply Rafters


Manufacturing is complex and often leads to inefficiency and extra costs. PWI's material handling packages transform production space by increasing capacity and improving efficiency. Here to tell us more about a recent project is Brandon Hershberger, director, marketing, PWI.


OCH: Brandon can you give us an overview of this project with Rigidply Rafters? BH: PWI was chosen to partner with Rigidply Rafters, a wooden truss manufacturer, on an overhead crane project located in Eastern Pennsylvania. The project featured 10 underhung motorized bridge cranes mounted to four separate runway structures. The crane capacities range from 3t up to 5t with spans from 55' up to 95'. These cranes included Starke crane components, Shaw-Box wire rope hoists from CMCO, and InMotion radio remote controls. Most of the cranes will be used to work with


52 Fall 2024 | ochmagazine.com


and move the product around the facility as it is manufactured and then loaded onto trucks.


OCH: Before PWI was commissioned on this project, what other specifications did the client ask for? BH: The customer had three goals in mind before the project was awarded and the design began. The first goal was to optimize the working width of the cranes between the building columns that were not all aligned throughout the building. This unique column layout accommodated machinery and the intended product flow. The second goal was to maximize the hook


height and clearance of the cranes throughout the building to accommodate the large product being manufactured, manufactured machinery heights and the significant height distance between the existing building and new addition. The third goal was to minimize the impact of the crane on the steel building package.


OCH: Were there any design challenges throughout the process? If so, what solutions did PWI provide to overcome them? BH: To accommodate the first goal PWI used an underhung crane design to provide adequate crane coverage in the customers intended


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63