search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Globalisation No company


is an island


Ahead of its implementation in 2024, the arrival of the OECD’s global taxation rules, propelled by international collaboration, strives to end tax avoidance. But is the fairer-for-all regulation simply too fl awed to forge a new fi nancial era – especially for poorer countries reliant on the good will of foreign multinationals? Natasha Spencer-Jolliffe investigates, along the way talking to Daniel Bunn, president and CEO of the Tax Foundation, and Dr Pie Habimana, lecturer at the Faculty of Law at the University of Rwanda.


F


ew


laws have


the potential to transform the entire planet – but the


appropriately named ‘GloBE’


might just manage it. An acronym for Global Anti- Base Erosion, the series of rules expects countries to slap a ‘top-up’ tax on multinationals that have set up subsidiaries in countries where they do not have effective tax rates of less than 15%. Expected to come into force in 2024, this brainchild of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has already been embraced by more than 135 countries and jurisdictions. Yet if GloBE is intended to stop companies from avoiding tax, abusing the generosity of host nations and


Chief Executive Offi cer / www.ns-businesshub.com


creating a level


playing field for global investment, how robust is the specific framework to meet these aims – and what might such globalised rule-making suggest for the future of international taxation?


A global tax


GloBE falls under Pillar Two of the OECD’s Inclusive Framework (IF) on Base Erosion Profit Shifting (BEPS), an aspirational programme, dubbed the BEPS Actions Project, designed to help address tax avoidance, create consistency across international tax rules – and produce a more transparent tax landscape worldwide. These aims make sense. As the OECD notes, after all, so-called BEPS practices may cost


19


Elnur/Shutterstock.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44