search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Company insight


The Fiscal approach builds continual risk monitoring with its clients, allowing them to augment existing systems.


and ill-defined area, but there’s no doubt that it’s an emerging threat around compliance and risk. So it’s not surprising that our customers are now demanding more monitoring around that.”


In practice, that might involve identifying sanctioned entities, or those that have scored poorly on other practices such as environmental compliance or waste. Sanctions are an excellent example here. The recent outbreak of war in Ukraine has led to the introduction of a wide raft of sanctions against Russian businesses and individuals. And while it is a dynamic situation, it is fair to say that any business with exposure to Russian partners will need to pay close attention to their risk for the foreseeable future. Currently, sanction lists are updated every day, but just 9% of organisations conduct monthly checks on whether suppliers have been sanctioned. A reliance on one-off sanction checks during new supplier onboarding does not provide adequate protection – anything less than daily checks introduces a risk of non- compliant supplier purchasing. “Businesses will want to know if sanctioned entities might be in their supply chain as well as who’s done something about that,” explains Cashen,


Finance Director Europe / www.ns-businesshub.com


noting that understanding whether they have been paid since the sanction was applied is important too. “Essentially, buyers need information that can enable them to take remedial action if necessary,” Cashen adds. “And it needs to be in one place, clearly presented, and delivered in a timely way. They want it now, they want it to be accurate – and they want to know what to do about it.”


Quick wins Crucially, the Fiscal approach builds in continual risk monitoring, allowing it to augment existing systems. “It’s an easy, quick, fairly simple transfer from a standard ERP,” says Cashen. “It’s automated and it can be set up in 3–4 hours. And while some clients opt for a big bang approach, others are more iterative.” But while it may not be sexy, fraud prevention and loss detection is not seen as a business critical factor – but more as a cost burden. “The irony is that the amount you can save on the bottom line is remarkable,” says David Thorley, customer development director at Fiscal. “In fact, most customers typically find that it’s repaid its investment cost within 30 to 60 days.” Given all this, it is hard to understand why the continuous monitoring approach


has not become more widespread as a solution to the problem. But, as Cashen suggests, the customers that deploy this solution most effectively are those that recognise they have a problem in the first place. “We do sometimes see customers who may be too proud to admit that they could do better.”


“But organisations that are self-aware, open and forward thinking in this area – and keen to run their processes more efficiently – embrace it,” Cashen adds. “They have to acknowledge they can do better here. Because most companies can – and we can help them.”


Risk insight Fiscal Technologies was founded in 2003 on the belief that it could provide a single Procure-to-Pay (P2P) risk management solution from which great things can grow and scale.


Fiscal clients have a choice – seize the opportunity for change or be left behind. Its engineers have spent 17 years designing and building a dedicated P2P risk protection solution. The result is a comprehensive solution that proactively identifies risks and reduces costs. ●


www.fiscaltec.com 57


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77