search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Manufacturing technology


Know anything about medical manufacturing – the high distribution costs, the need for speed and efficiency – and this rush towards robotics makes sense. But though factories the world over rely on machines to make their devices, they equally exploit technology to check them for problems. This isn’t particularly surprising. With FDA fines for faulty equipment sometimes rising to eye-watering figures – a few years ago, one Minnesota company was fined $27m for supplying hospitals with defective heart devices – companies are under immense pressure to ensure their products do what they promise. And in a world where factories often stretch across dozens of production lines, it’d be too expensive and time- consuming to check thousands of devices by hand. Enter ‘vision systems’ – the broad name for a range of automation technologies, together ensuring everything from syringes to artificial hips reach their patients in prime working order. They’re now so central to the inner workings of device development, in fact, that ‘automation’ is often just as likely to refer to vision systems as to the manufacturing process itself. Nor do the technologies underpinning these platforms show any sign of slowing down. Backed by AI and machine learning, inspection protocols could soon become even more sophisticated – even if manufacturers probably shouldn’t sack their human staff just yet.


Grand visions It’s tempting to imagine that vision systems developed together with general automation – but seen in a certain light, they’re much older. As long ago as the 1960s the algorithms that modern vision systems rely on were first being honed – while image coding began to be investigated in the 1970s. Whatever their origins, it’s clear that vision systems are now familiar sights on factory floors across medical manufacturing. “We have one medical line, for example, where we have 48 vision systems on it,” says Ken McClannon, a technical business unit director for Jabil Healthcare Pharmaceutical Delivery Systems. “Now there might be 250 stations on the entire line – so 20% of the stations on the line are vision systems.” With those kinds of numbers, it’s no wonder McClannon says his work really encompasses “automated assembly and testing” as opposed to mere assembly – a fact that other experts are happy to explain. As Anil Bharath, professor of Biologically- Inspired Computation and Inference in the Department of Bioengineering at Imperial, at Imperial College London puts it, the “fast through-puts” vital to modern manufacturing could be impossible with cumbersome manual checks, while plumping for the occasional spot check might put an operation’s quality control (QC) at risk.


Medical Device Developments / www.nsmedicaldevices.com


But if device safety explains the broad importance of vision systems – shadowed by the fact that outstanding QC can increase company profits by up to 15% – their real ubiquity can be understood from the variety and complexity of modern medical devices. In Mexico, to take one example, industry giant Medtronic has a factory boasting 4,000 workers making everything from catheters to stent grafts. At the same time, the increasing sophistication of modern medical devices is forcing firms to invest in robust vision systems. At their most technical, devices like eye implants might have hundreds or thousands of tiny pieces, each needing to be flawless in shape and length. The size of devices also makes vision systems a necessity. With defects sometimes the diameter of a single human hair, it’s unsurprising that manufacturers rely on machinery to catch issues humans could never see. In fact – and as the name implies – perhaps the easiest way to understand vision systems is as all- seeing eyes, programmed to peer over conveyor belts and warn workers of problems. To make that happen, platforms are equipped with special lights, often in contrast to the surrounding environment, ensuring that the machines can spot scratches or dents. That’s typically echoed by investing in the strongest cameras – with McClannon claiming that resolutions are getting “higher and higher” all the time.


“You can use specific wavelengths, in terms of the colour of light you use and so on, and use multiple different lighting strategies to inspect different features of a device”


Ken McClannon


Rage against the machines As McClannon’s last comment suggests, vision systems are constantly being sharpened. And if higher resolutions are one area of work – the latest systems can sometimes provide zoom up to 21 megapixels – the Irishman is equally enthusiastic about other improvements. That’s true, for instance, in terms of lighting. “You can get very specific about how you design your lighting for the application,” McClannon explains. “You can use specific wavelengths, in terms of the colour of light you use and so on, and use multiple different lighting strategies to inspect different features of a device.” In a similar vein, McClannon describes the higher memory of modern vision systems, meaning that platforms are cheaper and faster than when he started in automated manufacturing some quarter century ago.


More than that, however, perhaps the most revolutionary development in vision systems is


45


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140