| 71
a long list of technical requirements on individual forest owners, incurring costs out of proportion to size of forest holding. SHC, it said, offers a “low-cost, robust solution that can work at scale and ensure recognition of sustainability of large areas of previously uncertified forest in ever more demanding markets”.
The scheme is based on risk assessment and
takes a jurisdictional approach. SHC will draw on systematic expert analysis of increasingly high resolution satellite and forest inventory data, and forest governance, enforcement and other regulatory and non-regulatory measures at state level in the US to certify multiple small forest holdings engaged in low intensity forest operations. It fills the gap in forest certification which at present is almost exclusively confined to larger state or industry-owned forests. The latter, which are already largely covered by FSC and SFI in the US, would not be certified by SHC. According to AHEC the SHC:
• Builds on the accumulating wealth of jurisdictional risk-assessment
• Allows hardwood certification at scale in regions with fragmented forest ownership
• Is zero-cost to individual forest owners and low cost to hardwood mills
• Meets the criteria of private and public sector procurement policies in major
international markets
• Responds to consumer demand for simple messages on product sustainability
With markets worldwide imposing ever stricter requirements for proof of imported timber legality and sustainability, said AHEC, there is growing reliance on certification resulting in a particular challenge for small forest owners. The increasingly recognised solution for these owners, it maintains, are “new forms of verification, such as due diligence systems, risk-based verification and jurisdictional certification”. The approach is already being widely adopted in other sectors, including wood biomass and agricultural commodities.
On proof of provenance, SHC is developing a chain of custody standard designed to align closely with existing certification standards so that it can be readily integrated into procurement and management systems throughout the supply chain.
AHEC is also exploring the potential to
make greater use of new technology to ensure the integrity of certification claims. AHEC is working with science-based wood traceability specialist World Forest ID which is building a library of samples of hardwoods from around the world, against which traded timber can be compared to prove species and origin using such techniques as stable isotope ratio and DNA analysis (TTJ January/February 2022).
In the US, World Forest ID is developing a library of key commercial hardwoods from across the country and has undertaken a pilot with white oak and tulipwood in Kentucky.
AHEC also believes SHC, which is non- profit, has potential in other hardwood producing regions. “We’re mindful that the hardwood sector in other countries where there is a high dependence on smallholders may face similar market access issues as the US sector and later wish to participate in the programme,” it said.
SHC is now seeking endorsement from across the hardwood supply chain and has a downloadable Statement of Support on its website (
www.shc-cert.org). If given sufficient backing, development of SHC will be rolled out over the next two years with a target to deliver the first SHC certified hardwood into the market before the start of 2025. One objective is to ensure that the framework is operational by the time the EU’s new Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) is implemented. Alongside development of SHC, AHEC is also working through diplomatic channels to ensure that jurisdictional based forms of certification like SHC are given appropriate recognition in the text of EUDR and equivalent legislation to avoid discrimination against hardwoods from smallholders. ■
Above left: The US remains the biggest hardwood exporter
Centre: Tulipwood and white oak samples are being collected by WFID in Kentucky Above right: US hardwood producing states detailed on AHEC’s interactive forest map
www.ttjonline.com | November/December 2022 | TTJ
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85
