PROJECTS | CSO - NORTH AMERICA


to support multiple large tunnels simultaneously over


extended geographical areas. For projects of this scale, good local representation is key. Herrenknecht has been active in sewer revamp


projects all over the world. Some of the most notable have been in the US. Steffen Dubé, President and General Manager of


Herrenknecht Tunnelling Systems USA, Inc., says: “Approximately 40 percent of our large-diameter projects in North America are part of CSO projects.” The examples below illustrate the challenges of


recent such project work, undertaken in Washington, D.C., and Los Angeles.


A COMPLEX NETWORK IN WASHINGTON, DC One landmark project in terms of its scale and complexity is DC Water’s Clean Rivers Project in Washington, D.C. Here Herrenknecht is managing the complete scope of the tunneling project and providing all six TBMs (see Table). The two TBMs that will be starting work in 2025 are


multi-mode and variable-density machines, respectively, built to handle challenging ground conditions beside and beneath the Potomac River. “This tunnel alone is scheduled to reduce the number


of CSO events from 74 to four each year, and to cut CSO volume by 93% in an average year”, Dubé says.


In total, the Clean Rivers Project will deliver nearly


29km of new tunnels to provide intermediate storage and act as new feeder lines to the Blue Plains Advanced Wastewater Treatment Plant.


GOING LONG IN LOS ANGELES Herrenknecht’s big project in Los Angeles involves a single tunnel, 11.2km in length, to carry secondary treated effluent from a treatment plant to outfall pipes on the coast. Its length, pressure and challenging geology combine to make the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant Effluent Outfall Tunnel another industry landmark. The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts serve


more than five million people. The two existing tunnels that carry wastewater to the outfalls are more than 70-years old and do not meet current seismic standards. If they fail, untreated sewage could be discharged into surrounding waterways. The revamp project will temporarily replace them


with a single earthquake-resistant tunnel with a diameter of 5.5m to handle current flows while the existing tunnel are inspected and repaired. Ultimately, the new tunnel adds both redundancy and increases the overall system capacity. Contractor Dragados USA used a Herrenknecht slurry


TBM to manage the very variable ground conditions. Around half of the length passes through various soils; another 5% through weak rocks such as marl and mudstone; and, the remainder through weak and heavily fractured shale and sandstone. At this end of the tunnel the overburden depth increases to 150m, with 85m of hydrostatic head from the groundwater table. Excavating the original tunnels was clearly a


challenge to the engineers of 1937 and 1958, with records showing evidence of squeezing. With its adaptability and much faster forward speed, the Herrenknecht TBM has made the new tunneling task simpler – but it remains a project to be proud of.


OTHER SIZES, OTHER COUNTRIES In other CSO projects Herrenknecht has supplied machines for tunnels as large as 11m diameter. At the other end of the scale, the company’s CSO projects in the US have required TBMs below 5m in diameter, with pipejacking instead of the segmental linings used in the larger projects. Although the US is a leader in terms of both


awareness of the CSO problem and investment to mitigate it, the same issues affect many other countries worldwide. Canada’s eastern cities, for instance, share many issues with their US counterparts across the Great Lakes. In the UK, awareness of the issue is behind that in


Above: TBM used for Joint Water Pollution Control Plant Effluent Outfall Tunnel, in Los Angeles


20 | Summer 2025


North America, but generally ahead of the European Union countries, where around half of the sewers are of the combined type. Clearly, tunnelers will be in the sewer business for a long time yet as big cities worldwide upgrade their infrastructure to protect our oceans and waterways.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61