search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Carbon capture and storage| Turbine technology The last mile will be thermal


Why gas turbines equipped with carbon capture and storage will power the net-zero transition


Professor Emmanouil Kakaras EVP, GX (Green Transformation) Solutions, EMEA, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries


The global energy system is undergoing its most significant transformation in a century. Electrification across transport, buildings and industry is accelerating, driven by factors such as the rollout of electric vehicles, growing uptake of heat pumps, and the shift to electric industrial heat. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), global electricity demand is expected to increase by more than 3% annually between now and 2026, with electrification in end-use sectors contributing to the majority of this growth.


This growth is placing new strains on power systems, particularly arising from data centres driven by AI, cloud computing, and digital services that are becoming major electricity consumers. As we move further into the energy transition, the challenge is not just to supply more power, but also to do so with lower emissions without compromising the reliability of the electricity supply.


Renewables must continue to grow and will remain the foundation of decarbonisation. However, more needs to be done to provide the flexibility and resilience needed to meet today’s power demand. While solar, wind, geothermal, and battery energy storage can take us a long way towards net zero, covering the final stretch is increasingly complex and costly — requiring overbuilt capacity, long- duration storage, and grid reinforcements to manage variability. This is why I argue that the last mile will be thermal.


Hydrogen will play an important future role as a clean fuel for thermal power generation, but issues relating to cost, infrastructure and availability still constrain its near-term impact. At the same time, carbon pricing is increasing the cost of unabated thermal generation. This adds cost pressure to gas-fired power plants without a clear decarbonisation path, adding more risk to their business case, which is


already stretched due to the anticipated low operating hours.


This is where carbon capture and storage (CCS) equipped gas turbines offer a pragmatic response. They allow dispatchable plants to reduce emissions at the source and remain viable in a carbon-constrained world. More importantly, they help maintain the grid flexibility required to absorb more renewables. This is not about replacing renewables, but about making progress towards a carbon free power system, meeting the timelines for reaching zero emission and increasing the resilience of the system at minimum cost with the tools readily available.


The case for CCS in gas power CCS has gained traction in industrial sectors that are hard to decarbonise like cement, petrochemicals and steel. But in the power sector, progress has been slower. Infrastructure gaps, policy uncertainty and investor caution due to the cost addition have limited deployment.


Yet the need is urgent, and there is a lack of any realistic alternative. Dispatchable low- carbon solutions are required now, and CCS- equipped gas turbines are a viable option that is commercially available. The current barriers are not technical, but economic and regulatory. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has already demonstrated the feasibility of equipping gas turbines with carbon capture and storage. In 2024, we completed a commercial scale CCS application on a gas turbine in Ravenna, Italy –


demonstrating the feasibility of capturing CO2 from low-concentration flue gas. At Ravenna, the capture process is being used to treat low- CO2


flue gas from a natural gas fuelled turbine driving a turbo compressor.


This year, we launched a project in Himeji, Japan, this time capturing CO2


from a turbine


generating electricity. Himeji offers a model that is closer to the requirements of the power sector and proves the operational readiness of carbon capture and storage in real-world conditions.


Ravenna carbon dioxide capture plant, Italy. Photo courtesy Eni S.p.A. MHI’s proprietary KM CDR Process™ carbon capture technology is being deployed here to remove approximately 25 000 tonnes of CO2


fuelled turbine driving a compressor. CO2 peaks of 96%. The captured CO2


annually at Europe’s first fully


operational post-combustion carbon capture plant. The project, developed by Eni and Snam, is focused on treating low-CO2


(less than 3%) flue gas from a natural gas emissions are being reduced by 90%, up to


is subsequently transported through reconverted


gas pipelines and then injected and stored at a depth of about 3000 meters in Eni’s Porto Corsini Mare Ovest depleted offshore gas field


CCS is also cost-effective in specific roles. In renewables-heavy grids, gas turbines are often used for a few hundred hours per year during low wind or solar periods to guarantee the security of supply and system stability. Even at these low utilisation rates, our modeling shows that CCS-equipped turbines can outperform hydrogen-only alternatives under current market conditions.


www.modernpowersystems.com | July/August 2025 | 33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79