Turbine technology |Data centre power
From air to algorithm: why filtration is critical for data centre performance
Demand for data centre services is set to soar over the coming years as AI penetrates every aspect of modern life. Data centres need energy, lots of it, but they also need rock-solid reliability. The right design choices for gas turbine intake filtration are critical
Pete McGuigan Global LNG Market Manager, Filtration & Energy Solutions Division, Parker Filtration Group
With the rise of the energy-hungry data centre and the emergence of its greedy cousin AI, soaring energy demand for IT services is already placing substantial strain on power networks worldwide. In some places this unprecedented load is becoming intolerable. Ireland, for example, saw TSO (transmission system operator) EirGrid effectively ban further development of grid-connected data centres in the Dublin area from 2022 until 2028. This was prompted by concerns that the power demand would get so big that the grid would not be able to cope. It’s perhaps easy to see why. According to Ireland’s Central Statistics Authority, data centres used more than a fifth of all metered electricity generated in the country in 2023. This issue stretches far beyond Ireland. Estimates vary, but some suggest that data centres already consume around 3% of global electricity production, and that figure could potentially rise to more than 10% by 2030.
While most individual data centres are relatively small in terms of energy consumption, with demand of around 5-10 MW, larger, so-called hyperscale, data centres are emerging with capacities of 100 MW or more. This is becoming a strong trend as the use of AI becomes more prevalent. A search using an AI platform like ChatGPT uses around 10 times more processing power and energy than a standard, simple Google search. Again, this is being reflected in supply challenges for power utilities. Late last year, for example, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) had to grant special permission to supply 150 MW to a data centre in South Memphis developed by Elon Musk’s xAI company for its Grok AI platform. At the same time, this prodigious energy demand naturally comes with a large carbon footprint. Consequently, the major data centre players like Meta, Google, Amazon and X are all investing heavily in renewable energy as a way of offsetting their energy use. Indeed, IEA analysis notes that these data giants are also the four largest purchasers of corporate renewable energy, having contracted at least 50 GW. This is equivalent to the entire generation capacity of Sweden. While contracting for renewables achieves the low-carbon goal, these technologies also come with their own set of challenges, chiefly their variability. Above all else, data centres require a reliable energy supply regardless of whether or not the wind blows or the sun shines.
Correct air intake product configuration and selection will provide a significant longer term operational payback
In the light of these looming challenges and the primary need to secure dependable 24/7 power, data centres are increasingly looking at ways of ensuring an additional capability of having self-generated dispatchable site power, if not as the primary source, then at least as backup. This approach can avoid many of the issues associated with a lengthening connection queue to a congested grid, can smooth any of the variability that is characteristic of renewable energy resources like wind and solar and can provide independence of operations, allowing for self-sufficiency. However, while generating your own power at the site may be a good choice for a growing number of data centres, reliability still remains the key consideration.
The aeroderivative choice One of the prime choices for data centre self- generation of power that can be controlled and adjusted on demand is the use of aeroderivative turbines such as the GE Vernova LM2500XPRESS, Siemens/Rolls-Royce SGT-A45TR or the Solar Titan family of machines. Highly efficient, with renowned reliability, and extremely quick to install and start from cold when compared with other solutions, aeroderivatives meet many of the core data centre power requirements. For these reasons, aeroderivatives have long been used to serve as backup power units for data centres when there are disruptions to grid-supplied power. In addition, they are deployed to smooth any major
12 | July/August 2025|
www.modernpowersystems.com
fluctuations in renewable energy supplies. In Texas, for example, where wind and solar farms are sometimes recruited as the primary electrical power source, gas turbines are often used to provide rapid response flexibility and act as backup when there is cloud cover or low windspeeds. And, with outputs of the order of 25-60 MW, such machines are ideally matched to serve the data centre sector right up to the hyperscale. Larger frame engine sized gas turbines are also finding use, however, employing multiple smaller aeroderivative gas turbines allows the N+ capacity model to be applied as AI demand grows. By deploying multiple machines, including a reserve unit or two, it is also relatively easy to ensure sufficient generation capacity is always available to meet energy demands during routine maintenance outages or even in the event of an unanticipated failure. With their origins as aircraft jet engines, aeroderivatives have for many years found applications offshore and for mobile generation, typically used to supply emergency power following a natural disaster or to a large public event. These smaller machines also allow easier and quicker installation. When deployed as backup power for AI data centre service, such units can be started quickly but also then turned down quickly. Given that many data centre sites in North America are actually leased rather than owned outright, this is a distinct advantage. And, as many mobile units may also be considered as non-permanent
Source of illustrations: Parker Filtration Group
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79
