search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Turbine technology | Monitoring and diagnostics


Data resolution reduces over time, although eccentricity data serves as a backup to mitigate this. Updates: – System uses eccentricity as a redundancy for 1X displacement data in case of resolution loss.


Monitoring enhancements required Blade cracking is minimally monitored due to shrouded HP and IP blades.


Full NDT inspections, including shroud and tenon crack testing, are now standard for HP and IP rotors in prolonged operation. SETPOINT system upgrades for unit 2: – event-based waveform storage replaces time-based intervals;


Figure 7. Unit 3 IP turbine section being moved to replace the unit 2 IP section


Three missing blade packages on the rotor and extensive rubbing wear across multiple stages. A 90° arc of missing blades in the second-row top stationary blades.


Metal debris and severe damage to stationary blades in the casing bottom half, with blade fragments measuring no larger than 5 mm. Immediate repair of the IP turbine was not feasible due to the necessity for extensive re- blading of both the rotor and stationary blade diaphragms. With no spare blades available and the original manufacturer no longer in business, the only viable solution was to replace the faulty unit 2 IP turbine with unit 3’s IP section (Figure 7), which had fewer operating hours. To expedite the process, the replacement was conducted without opening the IP section for inspection or removing the unit 2 HP turbine section lid.


Repair and lessons learned The replacement of the defective unit 2 IP turbine section with the unit 3 spare IP section was followed by immediate testing (Figure 8). The unit was returned to service within demanding time constraints and with limited repair options. Below are listed key lessons learned and improvements implemented:


Need for improved data visibility in the control room


Operators lacked sufficient vibration data to assess if a manual shutdown was necessary. Quick actions by the Operator and Predictive Maintenance Engineer prevented further damage. Key issues: – 1X velocity and displacement data were not visible in the DCS.


– BP velocity data was available but not in alarm mode.


– Eccentricity data, effective in condition detection, was unavailable after 600 RPM. Updates: – Eccentricity now displays continuously on DCS trends across all units.


– 1X and 2X alarms will trigger unit 2 shutdown using SETPOINT’s state monitoring once installed.


Need to enhance diagnostic processes IP turbine blade failures affected HP section vibration, necessitating multiple measurements for accurate diagnostics. Eccentricity and 1X displacement proved most reliable for detecting and localising blade damage.


Diagnostic challenges: – 1X velocity readings were misleading as opposing broken blade packages cancelled imbalance effects. Updates: – Eccentricity monitoring is enabled at all speeds across all units for enhanced diagnostics.


Need to address monitoring system limitations


Compass system stores time waveform and spectral data at fixed intervals, potentially missing significant events.


– data integration with the PI system; – state-based monitoring with acceptance regions and alarms;


– full-spectrum analysis for rub diagnostics; – programmable relay voting and detailed event logging.


The improvements listed above aim to optimise monitoring, diagnostics, and preventive measures for enhanced turbine performance and reliability.


Managing ageing equipment: the critical factor


Unit 2 has been operating smoothly since the repair, and this is expected to continue with the implemented changes.


While this case study demonstrates a quick and successful resolution, many thermal power stations with ageing turbo-generating units face similar risks, often leading to extended downtime in the absence of spare parts.


Maintenance requirements vary by plant, but one critical factor remains universal: effective machine protection, condition monitoring, and diagnostic tools are essential for managing ageing equipment.


Figure 8. DCS plot during runup showing HP and IP turbine section BP vibration and eccentricity after replacing the defective IP section. The IP shaft eccentricity, 31.396 μm, is much lower than before (56.60 μm). The BP vibration (0.069 to 1.113 mm/s) is also much lower than before (5.604 to 6.540 mm/s)


20 | July/August 2025| www.modernpowersystems.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79