search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
News | Headlines


Safety concerns persist at ZNPP – IAEA Update


Ukraine Nuclear safety


Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) lost its immediate back-up 750 kV power supply to the reactor units for several hours during the week of 15 January. This was the latest incident underlining persistent nuclear safety and security risks at the site, director general Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency said on 19 January during its Update 207 report. The failure on 18 January of two of the ZNPP’s back-up power electrical transformers showed the continuing vulnerability in the availability of external power, which the plant needs to cool its six reactors and for other essential nuclear safety and security functions.


Even though the back-up 330 kV line remained available, the failure reduced the redundancy of the already fragile power supply. The 750 kV and 330 kV lines are all that remain available for the NPP, compared to four 750 kV lines and six 330 kV lines before the conflict.


The back-up power supply was restored eight hours later when two other back-up power electrical transformers were put into operation. The ZNPP is investigating the cause of the failure, but state that there was no sign of external transformer damage. But failure of the 750 kV line has happened repeatedly during the armed conflict.


“The plant’s vulnerable power status remains one of the main dangers for nuclear safety and security at the site. The situation remains extremely worrying in this respect. The site has already lost all off-site power eight times since August 2022, forcing it to rely on emergency diesel generators,” said Mr Grossi. During the past week, the IAEA experts discussed the plant’s maintenance activities with the ZNPP and were shown its high-level 2024 maintenance plan for such work, which is vital for nuclear safety and security. The ZNPP informed the IAEA team that the priority is to perform maintenance on the site’s safety systems as well as important activities not conducted last year. The annual maintenance plan includes the safety systems, diesel generators, unit transformers and the 750 kV electrical switchyard.


The IAEA team did not receive a copy of the plan, but based on discussions and information provided to the team the IAEA concluded that the ZNPP will not be implementing a comprehensive maintenance plan during 2024, although such a plan is considered essential to ensure plant safety and security. “This maintenance needs to be performed to ensure nuclear safety, especially in the current situation where the six reactors have been shut down for an extended period. It is important that the IAEA [is] able to fully assess nuclear safety at the ZNPP. We will


continue to monitor the maintenance situation closely” said Mr Grossi.


The IAEA team has continued to conduct walkdowns at the site, including to all six main control rooms, although IAEA experts were not permitted to ask the staff questions about their qualifications and experience.


After being granted access to the reactor hall of unit 6 recently, the IAEA experts are still seeking access to the other reactor halls, as well as to parts of all six turbine halls that they have not yet been able to visit, as well as to some of the reactor rooftops. Such access is needed to monitor nuclear safety and security as well as adherence to the five concrete principles for the protection of the ZNPP, director general Grossi said.


Mines along the perimeter of the ZNPP between the facility’s internal and external fences, which were previously identified by the IAEA team and were removed in November 2023, are now back in place.


Elsewhere in Ukraine, the IAEA teams at the Rivne, Khmelnitsky, and South Ukraine NPPs as well as the Chornobyl site continue to report that nuclear safety and security is maintained despite multiple air raid alarms heard over the past week. The IAEA experts at the Khmelnitsky, Rivne and South Ukraine NPPs have reported air-raids on a near-daily basis with the teams at the Khmelnitsky and Rivne NPPs required to take shelter on several occasions.


Biggest planned expansion of UK nukes for 70 years UK Nuclear power


On 11 January the UK government launched its plans for the biggest expansion of nuclear power for 70 years, including the prospect of a new power station on the same scale as Hinkley C and the 3.2 GW Sizewell C. Other measures such as smarter regulation are expected to help quadruple UK nuclear power to 24 GW by 2050.


The ‘Civil Nuclear Roadmap’ is intended to give industry a level of certainty about the future direction of the UK’s ambitious nuclear programme, adding to the government’s commitment to building Sizewell C and via industrial competition to develop small modular reactor (SMR) technology. The planned 24 GW will provide a quarter of the UK’s electricity needs.


The government will also invest up to £300 million in UK production of the fuel required to power high-tech new nuclear reactors, known as HALEU, currently only commercially produced in Russia. The UK is the first country in Europe to launch a HALEU programme, with


its North West England production hub aiming to be operational early in the next decade. An additional £10 million will be provided to develop the skills and sites needed to produce other advanced nuclear fuels in the UK. The roadmap also includes a government ambition to secure 3 to 7 GW worth of investment decisions every 5 years from 2030 to 2044 on new nuclear projects.


Plans to streamline the development of new power stations and introduce smarter regulation could speed up the overall process and, as a result, the delivery of nuclear power. This includes allowing regulators to assess projects while designs are finalised, and better join-up with overseas regulators assessing the same technology.


The government has at the same time published 2 consultations, one on a new approach to siting future nuclear power stations and another on supporting the sector and encouraging private investment to roll out advanced nuclear projects. The proposals are intended to attract investment in the UK


4 | January/February 2024 | www.modernpowersystems.com


nuclear sector by empowering developers to find suitable sites rather than focusing on those designated by government. Community engagement will remain critical to any decisions, alongside maintaining robust criteria such as nearby population densities. Analysis by the Nuclear Skills Strategy Group suggests that to reach 24GW, the civil and defence nuclear workforce will need to double over the next 20 years – supporting around 80 000 additional skilled jobs across the UK. The Taskforce will shortly set out plans to meet the demand of an industry – already worth £6 bn – likely to include increasing the number of graduates and apprentices and attracting mid-careerists with relevant skills. On 15 January the Sizewell C project in Suffolk triggered its development consent order (DCO) marking the formal start of construction for the 3.2 GW nuclear power plant. It follows the completion of pre- construction work and satisfaction of its planning requirements as set out in its Deed of Obligation.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37