EXPERT COLUMN | LEEA


A brief history of chain slings


– but they must be used in the correct manner to avoid dangerous lifting practices and service damage. Unfortunately, this has not always been the case, and many slings have been subjected to great abuse in service. Chain slings manufactured from wrought


C


iron are obsolete and no longer available. Mild steel chain slings were rendered obsolete in the early 1980s, following the publication of newer standards that specifically exclude the use of this grade of chain for lifting applications. However, it is possible that examples of wrought iron and mild steel chain slings may occasionally be found in service, but their continued use is not recommended by LEEA and they are outside the scope of the Code of Practice for Safe Use of Lifting Equipment (COPSULE).


Chain grades The history of material grades is rather complex. They are not, in fact, material grades but rather product grades. The origin is chain, and the grade is the breaking strength of the chain expressed as grade multiplied by chain diameter squared. It only works in imperial units so a 1” grade 40 chain breaks at 40 x 12 breaks at 80 x 1/22


= 40t. A 1/2” grade 80 = 20t. When chains went metric,


some companies started using letter grades to make the distinction. Others used an abbreviated number, for example, 4 instead of 40. Coincidentally, the mean stress at failure when expressed in N/mm2


is almost ten times


the breaking strength in tons derived from the above formula. So imperial grade 80 has a mean stress at failure of approximately 800 N/ mm2


hain slings provide a versatile, durable and safe means of connecting loads to lifting appliances


Ben Dobbs


Technical Committee


Ben Dobbs, head of global standards and legislation at the Lifting Equipment Engineers Association (LEEA), looks at the development of chain grades.


duty lifting operations. But for power operation, chains are surface hardened, which creates a hard outer layer on the chain to improve the wear, hence we have grade T (Types T, DAT and DT), the types DAT and DT being surface hardened. Also in ISO, there are grades TH and VH these being through hardened and grades T and V for hand operated hoists. When applied to components other than chains, the grades are not defined strictly by stress levels, rather by being compatible with the same grade of chain, so whilst the maximum stress levels may be of similar order, it is the manufacturer who decides on most of the dimensions (within the confines of the dimensional envelope) and, therefore, the stress level. Hence some manufacturers can use the same components for grades 8 and 10.


make the distinction, the mark 04 was used for normalised, and 40 for hardened and tempered. Later the factor of safety was reduced to 4:1, so it had to be hardened and tempered and again to make the distinction, grade M was used. So all three have the same breaking strength but the heat treatment and rating varied. Once all grades of chain were hardened


. The mean stress is now used to define the grade. So grade 40 became M or 4, 60 became S or 6 and 80 became T or 8. This has continued with grade 100 being V or 10. There were a few variations along the way.


The original BS (British Standard) grade 40 was used at a factor of safety of 5:1 and because of that, it could either be in the normalised condition or hardened and tempered. To


10 | October 2025 | www.hoistmagazine.com


and tempered, the letters and numbers became interchangeable and expressed as M(4), S(6) and T(8). However, for the European standards of the late 1980s, it was agreed to use the number grades for medium tolerance chains for chain slings and the letter grades for fine tolerance chains for hoists. At the same time, the terms ‘medium tolerance’ and ‘fine tolerance’ started to be used. Previously, chain for hoists was termed ‘calibrated’ to make the distinction, but in practice all machine-made chain is calibrated as part of the manufacturing process – the distinction is one of accuracy. The European separation of number and letter grades was then adopted in ISO. There are also a few other variations. Chains for use in hand operated hoists are through hardened, which is a heat treatment process that significantly increases their hardness and durability, making them resistant to wear and tear during heavy-


Current grades Currently, the majority of chain slings in service are grade 8 or grade 80 or T. Older national and international standards permitted the use of either letters or numbers to indicate the grade of chain irrespective of its intended use. However, most modern standards now reserve the use of numbers to indicate the grade of medium tolerance chain for chain slings and the use of letters to indicate the grade of fine tolerance chain for lifting appliances.


Other grades, notably 40, M, 4 and, to a lesser


degree, 60, S and 6 of welded construction, may also be found in service and are therefore covered by LEEA’s COPSULE. Grades 8, 80 and T have a breaking load twice that of grades 40, M, 4 and are ,therefore, lighter for the same strength. In many parts of the world, grade 10 or higher chain slings are available and gaining in popularity, and we are seeing some grade 10 standards across the world. On a European level, CEN TC 168, of which I am chair, is currently developing two grade 10 sling chain standards and associated grade 10 component standards. Grade 12, however, is not yet standardised. Further guidance on chain slings is in the LEEA COPSULE, which can be accessed at leeaint.com.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79