search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
“In advocacy, you have to take a very long view,” says


Cade Clark, HAI’s chief government affairs officer. “For example, we started working on the issue of 5G commu- nications and their interference with safety-critical aviation equipment in 2017, more than four years before those systems were slated for implementation. But when you’re dealing with a regulatory issue that involves multiple gov- ernment agencies, it takes time to turn that ship.” HAI staff led a technical working group with other aviation


stakeholders that analyzed the effect of 5G implementation on flight safety, reviewing proposals by the telecommuni- cations industry and recommending mitigation solutions. Te HAI Government Affairs team was also instrumental in raising awareness of the implications of 5G deployment in both the legislative and executive branches of the US government, becoming part of a standing meeting on the issue with members of the FAA, the National Economic Council, and the Federal Communications Commission. “In this era of rapid technological advancement, disruption


is inevitable, no matter what industry you’re in. 5G had been on the horizon for years, and we knew there would be impli- cations for vertical aviation,” says John Shea, HAI senior director of government affairs. “We raised our concerns throughout the Washington, D.C., ecosystem—with regulators, legislators, and those looking at the economic impact. To get the results you want, you have to present your fact-based, solution-ori- ented case in multiple meetings, to multiple stakeholders, and you have to sustain that effort over months or, often, years.” Ultimately, HAI’s advocacy for the vertical aviation


industry led to exemptions that allowed Parts 91 and 135 operations to resume, including those performing helicopter air ambulance, law enforcement, firefighting, and other essential services. Community compatibility continues to be an issue. At


the 1963 association convention and trade show in Palo Alto, California, complaints by local residents prompted the move of demonstration flights to an airport 4 miles away, and 60 years later, the sound produced by helicopters continues to be an issue. “I like to remind people that when they hear a helicopter


flying, they are often listening to the sound of service,” says James Viola, HAI president and CEO. For example, pub- lic-sector agencies, including law enforcement, firefighting, and search and rescue, account for the majority of helicopter operations in the Los Angeles area. Similarly, national security flight restrictions in the Washington, D.C., area mean that all helicopters overhead are either flying military or public-service missions.


16 ROTOR SPECIAL COMMEMORATIVE ISSUE


HAI recently worked with the office of US Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.-08), the FAA, and the Eastern Region Helicopter Council to adjust altitudes and routes that reduced aircraft sound in the Washington, D.C., area, allowing air ambulance, law enforcement, and military aircraft to continue their public service missions with no effect on flight safety. | Mark Bennett Photo


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180