search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Andy Peters Brighton & Hove Cab Trade Association info@bhcta.co.uk www.bhcta.co.uk


Chichester problems – update


My policy is that where I moan and complain I should always give praise where praise is due. So, having had a moan last month directed at Chichester licensing for not having any licensing enforcement officers checking up on their huge number of drivers/PHVs that predominantly work in Brighton, I am delighted to now give them praise.


After a series of reports against Chichester drivers for parking on, stopping on, teetering on our taxi ranks having been sent to Chichester licensing, we were assured that an email would be sent out to all their drivers. It was quite a good email too:


“Dear Licensed Driver,


Due to a recent number of private hire drivers / vehicles using taxi ranks, it is necessary to remind you of the following:


Taxi ranks are exclusively for hackney carriage vehicles; under no circumstances may private hire vehicles stop, park, nor drop-off at a taxi rank;


It is illegal for any vehicle which is not a hackney carriage of the local licensing authority to stop, park or drop-off at its taxi ranks, and anyone doing so may be subject to enforcement action by that local licensing authority.


Instances of Chichester private hire drivers/vehicles using the taxi ranks are frequently reported to this licensing authority, and are causing the taxi ranks' local licensing authorities additional work: Take note that any incidences reported to this licensing authority are recorded against the individual concerned and may be used in any determination of them being 'Fit and Proper' to hold licences.


Regards Licensing Team”


However, whilst that was an excellent warning, unfortunately it has not stopped persistent Chichester PHV drivers from carrying on regardless. So, another batch of complaints had to be sent. I have also suggested that as 99% the Chichester drivers / PHVs working in the city here are controlled by Uber


64


Chichester then the question should be raised about the company being ‘Fit and Proper’ to be a licensed operator.


I am looking to ask various other LAs that have their PHVs predominantly working here to send a similar email to their drivers.


Bus lanes


Next door to Brighton in Peacehaven on the coast road, cameras were recently installed by East Sussex County Council in the bus lane with signage stating: ‘Taxi’. If a taxi or PHV uses the lane an automatic fine is sent. If proof that vehicle is licensed is supplied then the fine is cancelled and the vehicle is added to an ‘Approved’ list.


I contacted ESCC and informed them that currently the signage only allows hackney carriages, and not PHVs as the signs state ‘Taxi’ and that a taxi is a hackney carriage and not a PHV and I provided the following information:


Traffic Signs Manual -2019 Department of Transport Chapter 3 – Section 9 – 9.1.2


“This section defines bus lanes and gates using prescribed traffic signs, primarily for buses, cyclists, taxis, and solo motorcycles. If certain vehicles like private hire vehicles are also permitted, it’s indicated by “authorised vehicles” on the sign. For other vehicles, such as heavy goods vehicles, authorisation from the national authority is required. Working drawings for non-prescribed signs, including those for bus lanes allowing heavy goods vehicles and high occupancy vehicle lanes, can be requested from the Department.


Bus Lanes:


These lanes are often reserved for buses, and may also include cyclists, taxis and solo motorcycles, as indicated by the signs.


Authorised Vehicles:


If a sign indicates “Authorised Vehicles,” it means that in addition to the primary vehicles, other specific types of vehicles, like private hire vehicles, are also permitted to use the lane.”


I informed them that if they wanted to allow PHVs to also use the bus lanes then the signage must be changed to


Vehicles” as stipulated by the DfT. SEPTEMBER 2025 PHTM include the wording “Authorised


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74