search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DRIVERLESS CARS


AMAZON BRINGING ‘ROBOTAXI’ ROAD TEST TO TWO NEW CITIES


Amazon is geographically expand- ing its pilot of an autonomous ride-hailing platform. The e-tail giant’s autonomous vehicle sub- sidiary Zoox, which it purchased for a reported $1.2 billion-plus in June 2020, is building on its successful 2023 pilot of a self-driving robotaxi on open public roads in Foster City, California, with no manual controls or human safety driver. Since that initial pilot, Zoox has continued testing and developing its robotaxi technology in Foster City as well as in Las Vegas. As it prepares to offer autonomous robotaxi rides to consumers later in 2024, Zoox will soon begin testing in two new U.S. markets: Austin and Miami, marking the fourth and fifth public testing locations for Zoox. The company started in its home city of San Francisco in 2018, expanded testing to Las Vegas in 2019, and then moved to Seattle in 2021. This latest expansion - to a new coast, and two new states - marks a significant step forward. After conducting a brief mapping mission, Zoox says it will deploy its retrofitted Toyota Highlander test fleet, with safety drivers, in small areas near the business and enter- tainment districts of the two cities. To run a robotaxi road test, Zoox identifies specific pre-planned routes that offer the most challenging driving features and scenarios, while also testing randomly selected point-to-point routes within a defined geofence. The company always starts with a focused testing area, expanding methodically as its AI gets more familiar with the unique conditions


PHTM JULY 2024


in each city. As Zoox continues growing its pilot, it has also been expanding its Las Vegas geofence while in- creasing automated vehicles’ driving speeds and ability to operate in light rain and at night.


According to Zoox, both of its new pilot cities offer unique test conditions. Austin has horizontal traffic lights, traffic lights hanging on wires, railway crossings, and thunderstorms, while Miami has traffic lights that are suspended diagonally across intersections. Zoox is not yet deploying its purpose-built robotaxi or offering public rides in Austin or Miami. Target cities for its first commercial markets remain Las Vegas and San Francisco. However, the company says it is exploring several cities for future commercial offerings after initial launch.


WAYMO ISSUES ANOTHER RECALL AFTER DRIVERLESS TAXI CRASH


Alphabet Inc.’s Waymo is report- edly pulling in its robotaxis for software updates after one of its vehicles hit a telephone pole. The incident happened in Phoenix, Arizona in May, when the Jaguar I- Pace driverless EV was on its way to pick up a passenger. It hit the pole at just 8mph, causing slight damage to the car but no injuries. The pole was apparently not mounted on the curb but at street level behind yellow lines, which the vehicle’s software seemingly wasn’t programmed to respond to. Waymo has already filed a notice with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, NHTSA, explaining that its 672 vehicles will be recalled. The new update will address the issue.. There will now be increased scrutiny on the firm and its


technologies given this is the second recall in 2024. The first happened when two of Waymo’s taxis hit the same pickup truck while it was being towed in Phoenix in December. Waymo later said the truck was being towed improperly, crossing a traffic lane. It was hit by one robotaxi, but the truck didn’t stop, and then it was hit by another. The NHTSA’ opened an investi- gation into Waymo’s cars in May. That was in response not just to the bangs and scrapes with the pickup truck but to a series of 22 separate incidents. Seventeen of them involved impacts with stationary objects, and other incidents were


simple traffic


violations, such as reversing in one- way areas or driving into oncoming traffic in the other lane.


53


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78