search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
LEGAL NEWS


JUDGE RULES ADDISON LEE WORKERS ARE ENTITLED TO BACKPAY


Leigh Day Lawyers has announced on their website that a judge ruled all Addison Lee drivers should be classified as workers, following a historic case brought by hundreds of drivers who are now entitled to workers’ rights and backdated compensation for holiday pay and loss of earnings. About 700 drivers, represented by lawyers from Leigh Day argued that they are workers, rather than self-employed independent con- tractors. In 2017, the Employment Tribunal ruled that three Addison Lee drivers were workers, entitling them to rights such as holiday pay and the national minimum wage.


Addison Lee’s attempt to appeal this ruling was dismissed, after a 2021 Supreme Court ruling in favour of Uber drivers in a similar claim. In February 2024, an out of court settlement was reached with the three drivers. Addison Lee then tried to argue that the 2017 judgment did not apply to the hundreds of drivers who have since brought similar claims. Leigh Day brought its arguments to a hearing at the Employment Tribunal in October and November 2024.


The Tribunal has now ruled that:


l All Addison Lee drivers are workers for Addison Lee


l All passenger drivers, courier drivers and executive drivers are working for Addison Lee during all times they are logged onto


20


falsifying an email that was a key part of the firm’s evidence.


The judge also concluded that the credibility of Kevin Valentine, Addison Lee’s Head of Delivery Services was “dented”. Leigh Day employ- ment solicitor Liana Wood said: “We are delighted


Addison Lee’s app or mobile device


l Owner drivers are working for Addison Lee from the time they have accepted work to the time the work ends


l Claims for holiday pay and national minimum wage can go back more than two years


l Lawyers from Leigh Day’s employment team say the holiday pay and national minimum wage compensation will be substantial for many drivers who have a long service working for Addison Lee.


The Tribunal also found that the changes Addison Lee had made since the 2017 judgment “paid lip service only” and so did not make any impact to drivers’ worker status. Employment Judge EJ Hyams was critical of the conduct of Addison Lee’s witnesses, concluding that Bill Kelly, Operations Director and Patrick Gallagher, a board level director and Chief Operating Officer, acted improperly in


that the Employment Tribunal has found in favour of Addison Lee drivers. This decision is of huge importance to drivers at Addison Lee who have been fighting for many years to be recognised as workers and to be paid properly for the work they do. We now urge Addison Lee to pay their drivers the compensation they are owed.”


Dave Lawrie, Director of NPHTA said: “Before we get the usual suspects claiming that this is about VAT, or that it applies to ALL private hire operators, let’s just clear up any mis- understanding. “Addison Lee operates in much the same way as Uber - collecting payment for all fares and then paying the driver - this is why they are subject to the same judgment as in the GMB employment case against Uber. “This ruling has zero impact on the traditional way in which many private hire operators continue to work, where the driver is paid the fare directly from the customer.”


FEBRUARY 2025 PHTM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76