search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Retention time


A concerning trend we see is that shipowners are shortening the on-board retention period of samples, disposing of them before a claim is brought against the vessel. This has led to costly settlements in cases where counter evidence could have been presented through retained samples. While sample lockers may be overfilled, it is crucial to maintain proper retention periods for potential disputes which in most cases are twelve months from the date of discharge.


Cargo surveyors


It is important to clarify the role of cargo surveyors and the misconception that issuing Letters of Protest for “failure to draw samples for the vessel” relieves the vessel from the responsibility of sampling or being involved in the sampling process. Cargo surveyors represent the cargo interests and follow their instructions, which may differ from the vessel’s interests. This can result in a lack of samples or disagreements regarding the representation of available samples.


Occasionally we experience ship owners who refrained from sampling by the ship’s crew because ‘unilaterally drawn and unsealed samples did not bear any value as evidence’. It is essential to remember that all samples can serve as evidence and samples taken by a ship’s crew are often the only evidence there is. Should a discussion regarding authenticity of samples persist, most products allow for fingerprint analyses, which would confirm that the samples are indeed representative.


By considering these recommendations and addressing the challenges related to handling of samples, the sampling procedures on board can be improved to ensure accurate monitoring of cargo quality and to secure evidence.


Sydney, Australia to replace seven


defective RiverCat ferries


The substandard safety of ferries operating along Sydney’s Parramatta


River prompted the New South Wales (NSW) government to order a new fleet of seven ferries. According to the New South Wales Government, they have granted the building tender to Richardson Devine Marine Shipbuilders in Hobart. The seven new vessels will replace the existing RiverCat vessels, set to retire after 30 years of service. Issues that have plagued the River Class over the years include:


- Not being able to fit under some bridges with passengers on the top deck - Asbestos - Sub-standard fit and finish - Wheelhouse window angles making night operations dangerous - Engine stalling - Potential of fires or electrocution caused by sub-standard electrical equipment and sub-standard steering components.


The new Parramatta-class vessels will not have upper deck seats, which was deemed too risky to utilise when going under Camellia Railway Bridge and Gasworks Bridge.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32