search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Wanted: a ‘digital’ vision By Maren Deepwell


Last year the Government announced a number of measures that impact on vocational education and training. They included £100 million for an additional 8,000 fully qualified computer science teachers supported by a new National Centre for Computing, a retraining partnership with the Trades Union Congress and the Confederation of British Industry to boost digital skills in the workforce, and £76 million to boost digital and construction skills. The term ‘digital’ has become shorthand for anything to do with using, or being influenced by, technology. It is added to existing terms to make new meanings – for example digital education, digital leadership, digital teachers and digital accreditation. Beyond education and training we operate in a digital economy and try to engage with digital democracy. We leave digital footprints, manage digital identities and even sign up for digital detox. ‘Digital’ is a term that has left its clearly defined roots so far behind that it is challenging to unpack its meaning even when there is a clear context – and in many instances policies seem to fall short of really getting to grips with what needs to be achieved and how it can actually be resourced. Is current policy-making in the UK effectively addressing the challenges that we face in the (digital) future in vocational education and training and beyond? Seeing Finnish education expert Pasi Sahlberg unpack the strategic direction of policy-making in different countries, including the UK, leads me to question whether a different approach to policy making is needed. My recent experience of being involved in delivering a national digital


skills course, funded by the Ufi Trust, clearly demonstrated how far we are from upskilling the workforce in general, and teachers in particular. It also showed how much we still need to do at all levels, from the most practical to the most strategic, to achieve the kind of culture change that, for example, the original FELTAG (Further Education Learning Technology Action Group) recommendations advocated. Confidence, competence and critical literacy are all essential components of using technology effectively for learning, teaching and assessment, and must be independent of particular tools or platforms. Just as our approach to training and accreditation needs to adjust, policy-making needs to make its own paradigm shift. Any measure that provides support or funding for providers in a sorely overstretched sector must surely be welcome, but it also needs a vision that is fit for the (digital) future we are facing.


Subject Focus – page 24


Maren Deepwell is chief executive of the Association for Learning Technology (ALT)


Digital Detox goo.gl/uQxqxg Visit Pasi Sahlberg’s website at goo.gl/XDfFAi For more on the Blended Learning Essentials: Developing Digital Skills course visit Future Learn at goo.gl/7KvDbW Read the FELTAG report at goo.gl/2CRtTS


FUNDING REVIEW SETS OUT AIMS The government’s Review of Post-18 Education and Funding has hit the headlines because of university tuition fees, but it is also expected to have a strong focus on the role of further education and training. The terms of reference for the


review, which was announced by Prime Minister Theresa May at Derby College in February, say it will look at how to help on eole ae effecte choices between academic, technical and vocational routes aer  The review will complement the


reforms under way – including those in the Technical and Further Education Bill published in October 2017 and the Post-16 Skills Plan published in July 2016 – to build a strong technical and further education sector. The review will be carried out by an independent panel led by Philip Augar, a leading author, and a former nancer an noneecte rector o the Department for Education. e rees e anel ebers include Bev Robinson OBE, principal of Blackpool and The Fylde College, and Alison Wolf, academic and author o te nental ol ee o Vocational Education, published in 2011. Baroness Wolf was interviewed in inTuition issue 27.


BEACONS OF SUCCESS Congratulations to all the winners of the Association of College’s Beacon Awards.


The winners of the 11 categories


were announced at the end of last year. They include Portsmouth College, which won the Jisc ar or te ffecte se o Technology in Further Education, and which we feature on page 29 of this issue. To see a list of winners visit the AoC’s website goo.gl/c5qM8X


INTUITION ISSUE 31 • SPRING 2018 7


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36