search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Government Relations Committee THE MARYLAND HORSE COUNCIL


by Jane Seigler, MHC Government Relations Committee Co-Chair


Regular readers of this column probably know that MHC’s Government Relations Committee spends a lot of time during the legislative session reviewing bills that have been introduced in Annapolis, flagging ones of interest or concern, and preparing and delivering testimony at bill hearings. But effective advocacy is more than just reading and responding to


legislation during the Session. Effective advocacy also involves building relationships and trust with individual legislators over the years. Tis lat- ter point was borne out in February when a bill (HB 640/SB 869) was introduced that was intended to address a concern that buildings used for “value-added agriculture” (think winery and brewery tasting rooms, etc.) were being wrongly classified as “commercial” rather than “agricultural” for purposes of property tax assessments. Te bill included buildings used for equine activities on the list of “value added agricultural” buildings. (Good) But - it prescribed that, while most buildings used in value added ag would be assessed at 25% of their full cash value, indoor riding arenas would be assessed at 50% of their full cash value. (Bad) We immedi- ately contacted the bill’s sponsors and asked for an explanation of this discriminatory treatment. As a result, they quickly agreed to reduce the assessment rate on indoor arenas to 25%, in line with other value added ag buildings. As of this writing, the hearings on these bills have been canceled and have not been re-scheduled. Te fact that we have worked so hard over the years to build relationships and a reputation as honest and trustworthy advocates paid off. Some of the bills on our radar include:


HB 57/SB 235 - would remove the exemption for veterinarians from the reporting requirements of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.


HB 113/SB 42 - would require minors to wear helmets when riding on public land or the grounds of a facility that solicits the public for recre- ational, educational or competitive activities, with certain exceptions. We have worked closely with the sponsors on this bill. As of this writing, the House bill has passed out of the House and moved over to the Senate.


HB 234/SB 278 - would allow the MD Horse Industry Board to set late fees for stable license renewals.


HB 305/SB 405 - would require the Dept. of the Environment to de- velop standards for outdoor lighting.


HB 402 - would authorize nuisance lawsuits for rodent infestations. Ex- empts properties used for equine activities, due to our efforts last year.


HB 511/SB 826 - would authorize a person operating a bicycle that is approaching a stop sign at an intersection on a highway with two or few- er lanes for moving traffic to “cautiously” make a turn or proceed through the intersection without stopping if the person reduces the speed of the bicycle to a “reasonable rate” and yields the right-of-way to vehicles in the intersection and vehicles near enough to the intersection “to pose an immediate danger.” Our testimony pointed out the vague terms in the bill, which make compliance and enforcement problematic and poten-


tially dangerous. Te sponsor promised to address. We have submitted suggested language.


HB 530/SB 645 - would establish a Maryland Office of Trails in the De- partment of Transportation to develop and maintain a Maryland Trails Network, and advance the development, maintenance, and use of trails in the State; would also establish the Maryland Trails Advisory Commis- sion in the Department of Transportation to provide guidance to State agencies regarding certain items related to trails. We are working to en- sure that equestrians are represented on the Commission.


HB 667/SB 17 - would establish that each animal harmed in a violation of a prohibition against animal cruelty is a separate offense; and other sentencing provisions.


HB 686 - would require “a program organized for recreational athletic competition or instruction for participants who are under the age of 19 years” to develop venue–specific emergency action plans for each facility for concussions and sudden cardiac events.


HB 778 - would allow statewide Sunday hunting of Migratory Game Birds.


HB 991/SB 1074 and HB 1404/SB 1149 - would authorize state (HB 991/SB 1074) or local (HB 1404/SB 1149) regulation and permitting of industrial sludge (DAF - dissolved air flotation by-products) facilities. Such facilities are often sited in rural areas, with little or no regulation.


HB 1388 - would add veterinarians to the list of professions for which “a noncompete or conflict of interest provision in an employment con- tract or a similar document or agreement that restricts the ability of an employee to enter into employment with a new employer or to become self–employed in the same or similar business or trade shall be null and void as being against the public policy of the State.”


HB 1494/SB 745 - would increase the number of MD residents in the stu- dent body of the VA-MD College of Veterinary Medicine from 30 to 42.


HB 1500/SB 847 - would repeal the 10:30 a.m. time restriction on Sunday hunting in Dorchester County for all game bird and game mammal seasons


SB 872 - would establish increased sentences of imprisonment for up to 3 years and a fine not to exceed $5,000 or both for the abuse or neglect of an animal if the abuse or neglect results in the death or euthanasia of the animal; and authorizing the court, as a condition of sentencing a certain defendant, to prohibit the defendant from owning, possessing, or resid- ing with an animal for a period of time determined by the court.


By the time you read this, the legislative session will be two thirds


over, and many bills that we are active on or watching as I write will have already passed or failed. Horse Council members will have received updates through our newsletter and social media, and a full wrap up of the session will be published in the May issue.


MHC does not endorse political candidates. We support incumbents who are in a position to support, or have already supported, the horse industry on general policy issues and in specific pieces of legislation.


www.equiery.com | 800-244-9580 THE EQUIERY YOUR MARYLAND HORSE COUNCIL PUBLICATION | MARCH 2024 | 29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52