search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Legal column


Sarah Bright reviews the pros and cons of using a ‘tontine’ clause when buying a French property


I


magine you are buying a house with the person you love, cherish and want to spend the rest of your life


with, for better or for worse. For personal reasons, if ‘death do you part’, your wish is that the house be left exclusively to your spouse/partner. Your spouse/partner has the same generous wishes for you. Maybe you’ve had an irredeemable feud with your children, or maybe, simply, you just don’t want the person with whom you shared your life, to have to share the house after you die. Whatever your reasons, you need to know how the law can help you achieve your goal. This is where the ‘tontine’ clause can come into play.


LEGAL TOOL Notaries both love and fear the tontine, but whatever their feelings, there is no denying that it is a powerful legal tool. As with any power tool, however, the key to safety is to know how to handle it. The principle behind the


clause is simple: if there is a tontine in the purchase contract of a property, the surviving spouse/partner is retroactively considered as having been the sole owner since the day of the purchase. This means that a property


bought with a tontine clause falls outside the scope of the inheritance, which presents a clear advantage for the surviving spouse/partner. Unlike England and Wales,


where there is no forced heirship, allowing people to freely leave their property to whomsoever they wish through a last will and testament, in France (like Scotland), a surviving spouse and children have a statutory claim to parts of the estate. With this in mind, the legislator installed a failsafe


to make sure that the tontine is not a disguised donation, purposefully made to deprive the protected inheritors of their rights on the property. This is why there are two


conditions to the validity of the tontine clause. Firstly, both purchasers must have contributed fi nancially towards the purchase; secondly, the tontine clause is a ‘bet’ on death, or a slightly macabre, blind hedging bet, not knowing who will pop off fi rst. This means that at the


time of purchase, it has to be impossible to determine which owner will die fi rst. Therefore, if there is a great age diff erence or one spouse is terminally ill, the tontine clause would not hold in court if the children/ heirs disputed it. And if there’s any doubt in


the sincerity of the clause, they will dispute it. Nothing creates animosity within a step-family more eff ectively than depriving them of their inheritance. You may have included a


tontine clause in the purchase deed with the most virtuous and altruistic intentions, but if you do not comply with the two conditions, you will have to deal with the consequences. Because there really are consequences for getting it wrong, and they shouldn’t be taken lightly.


COURT PETITION The fi rst consequence is the potential dispute with the other inheritors and the option they have to petition the court to ask that the tontine clause be requalifi ed as a disguised donation. This alone should set you up for a bitter relationship with them until the day you die – which is probably not in the spirit of what your spouse/partner wished for. If their claim is successful,


84 FRENCH PROPERTY NEWS: July/August 2023


“The beauty and the curse of the ‘tontine’ are that it is unbreakable unless both parties agree otherwise”


the surviving spouse/partner would be forced to compensate them for the value of their share in the property which is under the tontine clause. You have the house, but you


may not have at your disposal the cash to compensate the other inheritors. Meaning you would then have to quickly sell the property to allow you to pay them their share, plus the legal interest that has multiplied.


DIVORCE DIFFICULTIES The second and most important consequence you should be aware of is that a tontine clause is fundamentally diff erent from a joint ownership (known in French as an ‘indivision’). Provided that the tontine


clause is valid, it is completely and utterly binding, in that unless both parties agree to


remove it and liquidate the property by selling it or having one buy the other out, then you are bound to remain co-owners until one of you dies. This is the reason why a tontine clause is particularly dangerous in a divorce, especially with a French divorce. In France, there are two


types of divorce: mutual consent and litigation. When you have a mutual consent divorce, both spouses agree to all the various aspects of the divorce beforehand, including the fate of a property with a tontine. This means that you liquidate your assets (sell the house, buy the other out, share the furniture…) at the same time as you divorce. As the consent of both


spouses to the future of the assets and the consequences of


© SHUTTERSTOCK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148