search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
privacy ners


conversation, and that’s why my next uninvited email came from a PR agency telling me that Liverpool is the capital of happy marriages. This may well be true, but why tell me? And where did they get my private address? From the Gorkana database owned by Cision, natch. Of course, there is an upside to most things. For some


journalists, particularly freelances, this free-for-all may be a godsend, bringing them into contact with sources they might otherwise not know about, triggering ideas they can turn into income. I understand that. However, there are legal issues here as well as professional ones (see box below). The GDPR – the General Data Protection Regulation – introduced last year has officially curbed the excesses of invasion into personal information. That’s the idea at any rate and it has certainly frightened the PR people. The CIPR advises its members that recording, storing or using journalists’contact information, including work or corporate email addresses and social media accounts, means ‘you are processing their data’ and they have the same privacy rights as any data subject. They also say there is a grey area around pleas of ‘legitimate interest’ that could override privacy rights, the scope of which will probably have to be settled legally at some stage. Finally, there is a political dimension. PR people and lobbyists probably outnumber bona fide journalists by five to one. The lobby industry is worth £2 billion a year, says awkward-squad reporter Michael Crick. It is said to be ‘the next big scandal’ after MPs’ expenses. Let’s be clear. This is not Turkey or China, where they lock


up journalists, or Russia, where they shoot us. Database activity is not unlawful in itself and most list providers are careful to provide a lawful basis for the processing. However, it is a business practice many find uncomfortable and one that may sit uneasily with privacy rights. Roxhill could not or would not say where they got my


email address. Social media, they suggested. But I have never had anything to do with all that rubbish. My name has now been removed from the company’s hit list. Yours is probably still on it. You have been warned.


Databases and you: the law


JOURNALISTS HAVE a right to privacy, just like any other citizen. The Information


Commissioner, whose job it is to enforce data protection laws, publishes a 10-point


list of rights that are safeguarded. An organisation must


inform you if it is using your personal data, and provide the following information: • Why it is using your data


• What type of data it uses • How long it will be kept • Telling you who gets to


see the data • Telling you if data is going


overseas, and where • Your information rights


• Where the data is from (a


crucial one, this) • If data is used in profiling


performance at work, health, economic situation, preferences and interests • How to contact the


database organisation • Your right to complain


to the Information Commissioner’s Office. This is called ‘the right to


be informed’ and, if you think a database company is flouting these provisions, you can use a template letter on the ICO website to make a complaint.


theJournalist | 15


ANTON GVOZDIKOV / ALAMY STOCK PHOTO


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36