search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
operation of any sUAS. I understand there are some rumblings that the OEM is considering publicizing a suggested maintenance program. I question the wisdom of a suggested and voluntary sUAS maintenance program, however at least the subject is in discussion and therefore there is some hope! Also, the Airborne Public Safety Association (APSA,


formally ALEA) through its Public Safety Aviation Accreditation Commission has issued “Standards for public Safety small unmanned Aircraft system (sUAS) programs” which provides an extensive guideline for both pilot certification, and sUAS maintenance. They have adopted many of the rules and protocol that govern a manned aircraft operation. I just finished reading an article published through


Embry-Riddle: “UAS Maintenance: critical component in maintaining airworthiness” Authored by: Bettina M. Mrusek, Kristy W. Kiernan and Patti J. Clark, all members of the prestigious Embry-Riddle faculty. This paper delves into the importance of incorporating into the sUAS industry the same Scheduled Maintenance procedures for piloted aircraft that has evolved while not accidentally, but has evolved because of accidents over the years. The system has moved from a reactive


30 HelicopterMaintenanceMagazine.com February | March 2020


pursuit of “fly-fix-fly” to the predictive, sustained maintenance undertaking we use today for manned aircraft. The application of this program, was conceived and is currently embraced by all stake holders, beginning with the FAA, and includes the OEM’s, aircraft operators, pilots, component manufactures and technicians. This validated maintenance protocol should be, at the least, a starting point for a discussion within the sUAS OEM’s, the FAA and the sUAS community at large.


So although there is hope, in the meantime, I remain


apprehensive for the following reasons: First, the sUAS is easy to fly — almost too easy! I


know — I own a DJI Spark. This ease of operation coupled with the high-tech reliability promotes a false self confidence in your flying competence as well as the capability of the aircraft you are flying — AKA: operator complacency! Next while inexpensive compared to a manned


rotorcraft, the sUAS OEM has garnered a staggering amount of dollars generated from the sale of over 2,000,000 “aviation toys” that have morphed into working aircraft and insinuated themselves into the NAS. This makes sUAS OEMs a powerful cartel-


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68