search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BUSINESS NEWS


The CAA’s Air Travel Trust fund paid out £481 million in the wake of Thomas Cook’s collapse in September 2019


CAA reveals industry’s feedback on Atol reform


The trade rejects compulsory segregation of client payments. Ian Taylor reports In response, the CAA noted:


The industry came down heavily against mandatory segregation of customer money in the CAA’s Atol Reform consultation of April to June last year, describing the proposal as “overly complex” and “unworkable”. The consultation proposed


significant changes to the current Atol regime, limiting the use of customer money to make advance payments to suppliers and introducing ‘risk pricing’ through a variable rate of Atol Protection Contribution (APC). The CAA outlined a series of


options for protecting customer money, including use of trust or escrow accounts, a return to universal


48 2 JUNE 2022


bonding or a combination of the two. Its summary of the industry’s 305 responses – a record number for a consultation – notes a “consensus that change is necessary”. But the industry came down firmly against a compulsory ‘one size fits all’ approach, including compulsory segregation of funds. The consultation proposed total


or partial segregation and not just via a trust account, but also use of escrow or a separate client account although this would require additional security. Partial segregation would allow removal of some funds from an account up to a limit set by the CAA. It gave as an example “up to 20%” of a holiday’s value.


“The majority of Atol holders and the travel industry do not believe the CAA should put in place mandatory segregation. Many considered the system to be overly complex, interventionist and unworkable.” It acknowledged concerns at “the


significant cost of pre-departure payments” and “around prepayments, especially to major airlines”. There was concern also at the


additional cost and administrative burden of trust accounts and that segregation would have “a negative


Continued on page 46 travelweekly.co.uk


BUSINESSNEWS


PICTURE: Shutterstock/Markus Mainka


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48