search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WHITE PAPER: COMMODITIES PROCUREMENT


stakeholders in the German economy, political decision- makers and parties such as trade associations,” the paper states. It suggests six measures:


1. Diversification of refined and semi-finished metals On the one hand, the EU could support the build-up of metals refinery capacities in other countries by enabling viable business plans. This enablement can have different forms, one being prepayment or loans to finance the infrastructure capital expenditure, which would be repaid by the metals’ delivery. Alternatively, equipment could be financed with (export credit agency-backed) export finance. On the other hand, refinery capacity in Germany and in Europe could be enhanced as well. However, as metals refining has a high energy consumption with a potential negative sustainability impact, this would require further acceleration of renewable and alternative energy production.


2. Raw material sourcing outside the EU Germany and other EU members should secure commodity partnerships with countries in South America and Africa, as well as with Australia, to diversify the supplier basis for raw materials. These partnerships could either be set up via traditional long-term supply agreements, via financing the build-up of infrastructure for commodities in the partnership region, or via directly investing in foreign commodities producers.


3. Raw material sourcing within the EU Europe also has metals reserves which have not been mined over recent years, the paper states. Apart from commodities security, ramping up local mining could also substantially reduce transportation distances, and therefore reduce CO₂ emissions. On the other hand, labour and energy costs, as


Visit us at flow.db.com


Figure 2: Global demand to production quota for selected key commodities in 2018 vs 2040 outlook


Raw material Cobalt


Germanium


Heavy rare earths Iridium


Light rare earths Lithium


Ruthenium


Demand 2018/ Production 2018 quota


0.4 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.4


Demand 2040/Production 2018 quota ESG path


3.9 1.7 5.5 5.0 2.2 5.9 2.4


Middle path Fossil path (unlikely) 2.9 1.7 6.9 2.9 2 4


5.9


1.2 1.9 6.4 0.3 2.2 0.9 19


Source: Deutsche Rohstoffagentur, Rohstoffe für Zukunftstechnologien; illustration by Deutsche Bank


well as bureaucracy levels, are usually higher in Europe.


4. Build up strategic reserves Commodity off-takers should consider the possibility of building up reserves for critical input materials, the paper suggests. However, since this accumulation comes with significant storage, transportation and insurance costs, which result in additional financing needs, clear priorities for which raw materials and refined products should be stored are needed. The paper names two role models: in the US and Japan, public-private partnerships organise the commodities storage based on national surveys. Those surveys identify which commodities are needed and track the quantities of the top 50 products bought and stored by both state and private companies that are needed to withstand supply chain disruptions for up to 90 days.


5. Enhance recycling capabilities and recyclability To facilitate the increase in recycling capabilities, the paper names several initiatives – from increasing regulatory mandated recycling quotas, to creating a legal framework that facilitates


55


local recycling capacities. Moreover, products need to be designed in a way that enables them to be split up again, back into original materials. This starts with a thorough control of input materials and their compositions, and could be strengthened if minimum recyclability standards per sector or product category can be agreed.


6. Replace key commodities in the value chain The report states that only a few commodities are currently replaceable. To find more, economically viable substitutes for critical input materials and additional R&D investments are


needed. R&D projects should focus on finding ways to use lower quantities but more readily available commodities. Also, research clusters – bringing together producing companies and academics – could be an important tool to drive R&D. Taking all of these considerations on board, the paper concludes that securing access to commodities in times of geopolitical conflict and decarbonisation commitments will be challenging. But there are measures Europe can take to foster economic resilience, provided that governments, corporates, capital markets and banks can collaborate.


Download the full white paper


Use your smartphone to scan the QR code and download ‘Commodities security in a volatile world’ here


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92