search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
16


INSIGHTS


than pushing it away. Furthermore, the materials were not suitable, with the stone itself of poor quality, meaning it was inappropriate for use in areas of heavy exposure. This was clearly unsafe for human use. However, the necessary work of stripping away the coatings and stabilising the damaged stonework was set to significantly eat into the finished surface of the facade. This would have altered the carved details on the facade, creating a misshapen appearance. We needed to balance preserving the original look and feel of this landmark building, with the severity of the repairs needed. In response, we developed a set of conservation principles to carve into the surviving stone, effectively re-setting the entire building envelope backwards. This helped to reinstate the original grandeur of the facade, without changing its outward aesthetic.


Recreating the finish


Renovation required the facade to keep its original finish and key identifying features. In tandem, we wanted to ensure the use of new materials was kept to a minimum to avoid waste, thus reducing the renovation’s environmental impact.


Solving this aspect of the challenge demanded detailed understanding and meticulous planning. Point-cloud surveys of the facade were therefore taken before and after the coatings were stripped. This allowed the team to specify where and how each individual flat area should be finished. This information was then translated into a set of small elevations for use by the masons on site, showing how far each block should be dressed back, to fit into the overall arrangement.


Decorative details were re-carved insitu, as far as possible, to recreate the entire ornate finish of the building, while in turn keeping the quantity of new stone to an absolute minimum.


Supporting local trades


For sustainability to have as broad an impact as possible, it cannot just focus on environmental effects. While this plays a vital role, the industry must also focus on the social outcomes. The project supported businesses and craftspeople from the region, sourcing both labour and materials locally. This included stonemasons from Midland Conservation, who carried out repairs using traditional tools and techniques, working by hand to conserve almost every piece of decorative as well as most of the plain ashlar stone. This work led to Historic England describing the scale and traditional nature of the stone masonry repairs at the Grand Hotel as unique – in 2015 at least – for a non- ecclesiastical building.


Looking forward


Our structural engineers were subsequently involved in redesigning the internal structure too. This involved the construction of a new full height central circulation area and a steel structure for penthouse suites. Overall, these repairs and renovations have reimagined and reinvigorated the Birmingham Grand Hotel for future generations to enjoy. This project perfectly exemplifies how the industry can have a positive impact on the environment – using local experts and materials, avoiding unnecessary waste and stabilising a heritage structure. As such, it serves as a template for others in the industry to make do and mend wherever possible.


Thomas Pearson is an associate at Arup WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK ADF OCTOBER 2022


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76