search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INSULATION 75


result in damaging moisture problems for two primary reasons.


Adding any internal insulation will reduce the temperature of the existing wall masonry, making it more likely that condensation will occur to the inside as there will be less heat penetrating from the living spaces to warm up the masonry. Secondly, some insulation types – such as rigid foams – can further exacerbate the problem. If not adequately accounted for in the design, this moisture accumulation can continue unchecked, increasing issues with dampness and mould over time and, in extreme cases causing the masonry to degrade due to freeze/thaw cycles. Permeable insulation prevents moisture from being trapped in the construction and minimises disruption of the established balance of moisture flows within the building fabric to the same degree. However, traditional moisture vapour permeable insulation, such as mineral fibre, tends to be very bulky, causing a challenging for preserving interior space.


External or internal insulation? Protected historic listed buildings are often solid wall construction, and a commonly held perception is that it isn’t possible to insulate externally and not practical to insulate internally.


Preserving the external features of the property excludes the traditional approach to solid wall insulation. A traditional external application would be achieved through insulated boards being secured to the external face with a render finish. The drawback of this method is the change in the overall appearance of the dwelling. Internal approaches typically include the application of insulated plasterboard fitted to the walls of each room and then a subsequent plaster finish. The materials suitable for internal insulation can result in an overall reduction of floor space, and therefore the use of these traditional methods can often be impractical due to space constraints. Spacetherm WL is a high-performance laminate specifically intended for use where improved thermal performance is required with limited space. It is fixed to the internal surfaces of existing solid walls without the need for mechanical fixings. At only 13 mm thick, there is often no need to remove skirting boards and cornices, saving time and cost. Typically, a solid wall will have a U-value of around 2.1 W/m2K,


ADF FEBRUARY 2023


however using the product this can be reduced to around 0.8 W/m2K, depending on the wall material and thickness. An internal insulation system using materials such as mineral fibre, wood fibre or natural wool has a relatively high thermal conductivity, and therefore requires a significant depth of insulation to achieve modern thermal standards. Due to the depth required, these materials are typically installed within a freestanding frame, with a cavity to isolate them from the masonry – often resulting in a system depth of over 200 mm. Although this system typically won’t achieve thermal performance in line with Building Regulations, even a small upgrade in thermal insulation can raise the internal surface temperature enough to avoid condensation problems. For example, a solid masonry wall could be prone to surface condensation, particularly around window interfaces. If insulation is added to the main wall surface but omitted from window reveals, although the walls’ surface temperature increases, the reveals’ surface temperature drops, leading to increased condensation risk. Even adding a minimal amount of insulation to the reveals will elevate this temperature enough to mitigate this condensation risk, highlighting the importance of a continuous envelope of thermal insulation.


Callum Anderson is technical advisor for A. Proctor Group


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


Protecting listed buildings is much more than preserving the heritage of the past


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108