20
INSIGHTS
Different age groups and requirements When HLM Architects was appointed to deliver architecture, interior and landscape design for a new SEND school in Somerset, we were challenged with colocating multiple age groups across primary and secondary school levels, and varying abilities and needs, in one building.
The school will provide 120 pupil places, from ages 5-16 with Social and Emotional Mental Health Needs (SEMH) and Speech, Language and Communication Needs (SLCN). The new school is to be procured and delivered through the DfE Construction Framework as part of the Free Schools Programme. A responsible and collaborative design approach was critical, given the very specialist and multifaceted needs of this school. We started by conducting a series of engagement meetings with the DfE, Local Authority and the Trust, complemented by a detailed stakeholder and community engagement process. The vision for the school was then refined based on the feedback, concerns, questions and priorities coming out of this, alongside the original brief. The building had to be flexible enough to accommodate varying cohort sizes in each academic year, with accessibility and inclusivity being a major focus throughout. Our team also needed to ensure the availability of ample and distraction-free breakout spaces, a high level of security for pupils, an interior layout that facilitated optimum wayfinding and maximise opportunities for passive supervision, an effective landscape strategy and, importantly, achieve this in a way that aligns with the Local Authority’s ambitions to be carbon neutral by 2030.
A thoughtful approach By taking a thoughtful approach, we were able to design the school so that it can be organised by age and special educational need (SLCN or SEMH) based on a personalised approach rather than defined key stage groups. The design includes separate pupil entrances to effectively manage the beginning and end of each day, with the option to divide the different age groups and needs where required. Each classroom will feature dedicated break-out spaces, while group rooms and shared sensory and soft play areas have been introduced throughout.
Safety has been a priority on the project, with anti-climb fencing – softened by hedge and tree planting – to the perimeter. Corridor ends have been left open to enable views out, allow natural light in and are supported by glazed screens into each classroom, to aid better passive supervision of common areas at all times. The simple, central corridor circulation underpins the clear and intuitive wayfinding system across the building and is appropriately sized to allow sufficient area for pupils who require increased personal space – a critical element for this particular setting. Visual information is provided by distinguishing floors, walls, ceiling planes, doors and decorative elements, where colours and tones are carefully chosen to reflect the nature of the setting and avoid issues relating to sensory overload. Similarly, the interior spaces are configured in a way that will keep background noise to a minimum. In case of emergency, audio fire alarms will be supplemented by visual alarms for pupils with hearing impairments. There are four dining spaces catering for the different needs, ages and key stages. Additionally, a variety of toilet facilities have been provided to ensure all pupils have access to options that suit their age and physical needs. This includes a hygiene room with a hoist, shower, accessible toilet and changing bed.
WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK
As architects, we must consider how to deliver engaging learning spaces that better address the requirements of a much more diverse set of needs
Connected to nature The landscape, while based on a unique and dedicated strategy, was designed to allow seamless flow between interior and external areas and a sense of cohesion with the school’s surroundings. All classrooms have direct and secure external access to accommodate external learning opportunities and allow ‘dysregulated’ pupils to utilise a safe external space to practise self-regulation skills. There are also plenty of opportunities for outdoor and nature-based learning, sport and movement, socialising, play, relaxation, and quiet reflection.
Greenery is incorporated throughout the design, not only for its well-known wellbeing and calming benefits but also as a way to encourage biodiversity. Features such as the addition of a sensory garden, for example, will provide students with a connection to the natural environment, as will the creation of a variety of inspiring and peaceful spaces including food growing and habitat areas. A design approach that considers closer links with the environment also brings many sustainability advantages. To attain the local authority’s climate goals, the new school is aiming to be net zero carbon in operation. That means that careful attention was given to making the building as energy efficient as possible from the earliest design phase, by assessing the embodied carbon of materials, using local materials where possible and natural materials such as sustainable timber cladding, incorporating green roofs and PV panels, as well as installing sustainable drainage systems.
By more closely considering the needs of all SEND students in the design process and working with the Trust to understand their operational and management requirements, our hope for the school is that it provides a welcoming, inclusive, accessible, secure, positive and sustainable environment that will have the inherent flexibility to cater for a wider array of SEND requirements, both now and in the future. Most importantly, it will enhance the learning experience to provide the best education possible for every child.
Catherine Ward is associate architect at HLM Architects ADF FEBRUARY 2023
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108
