Flight Training Scare Tactics
Does Fear Really Help the Learning Process? By Randy Rowles
By definition, a scare tactic is a strategy using fear to influence a reaction. Instructors may use the fear of failure, injury, death and other scare tactics to motivate students and emphasize a point. The fear of a negative outcome is one of the leading problems in students today, and the data has yet to show a valid reason for flight schools and other organizations to continue using fear. Instructors are supposed to encourage flight students to learn, not scare them to the point of anxiety or indecision.
According to the Anxiety and Depression Association of America (ADAA), anxiety disorders affect 18 percent of U.S. adults. This is very real data and highlights a potential negative behavior for a pilot of an aircraft. The constant threat of failure, injury, or death may delay an action by someone affected by scare-tactic anxiety, especially when their flight experience is minimal.
I remember years ago when the Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 73 for the Robinson R22 was published, Robinson Helicopter Company produced a video to support the required training of the SFAR. The data provided by Frank Robinson was compelling on its own merit, however the accompanying crash videos provided to “make the point” were simply scare tactics. Was the training less effective without those videos? Did the visual or emotional effect of the video ever cause delay or distraction of a pilot when a critical decision was to be made?
Randy Rowles has been an FAA pilot examiner for 20 years for all helicopter certificates and ratings. He holds an FAA Gold Seal Flight Instructor Certificate, NAFI Master Flight Instructor designation, and was the 2013 recipient of the HAI Flight Instructor of the Year Award. Rowles is currently the owner of the Helicopter Institute. He can be reached at
randyrowlesdpe@gmail.com
If you have any comments or questions, please let me know at
randyrowlesdpe@gmail.com
88 May/June 2020
Not all people are adversely affected by scare tactics and not all negative information, either in visual or other forms, is considered a scare tactic. There is a line between creating a training benefit and causing mental and emotional harm to a student.
A few weeks ago, I was conducting confined-area training for a pilot in their newly acquired helicopter. On final approach, the pilot was hesitant to lower the collective to maintain the approach angle. As the maneuver progressed, the helicopter reached the desired point of landing. However, at an altitude of approximately 50 feet, the student continued the descent into the confined area vertically to the ground.
At the completion of the maneuver, I asked the student to critique the maneuver. He was proud to tell me that he had not exceeded any of the flight elements required to enter Settling-with-Power and had made the intended point of landing. When I queried about stopping at 50 feet above the spot and descending vertically into a confined space unable to see obstacles below, his response was, “There is a lot going on around the helicopter. I must focus on the most critical, and the threat of SWP is the most critical during a confined-area landing.” This pilot had nearly 1,000 hours in helicopters, most recently as a flight instructor.
Folks, if we effectively train pilots to be proficient at their craft, you will not need scare tactics. Emphasis on correctly executing maneuvers where data reflects high accident rates will provide much more benefit in reducing accidents than scaring someone with a theory that causes them to second-guess a decision – or worse, completely miss the real risks of a maneuver.
Videos and other historical training aids are fantastic to include in a measured, controlled training program. Scare tactics that use abstinence as the only solution ignore the many complexities required to safely operate a helicopter, and they create a disservice to our pilots.
Teach effectively and hold your students to a high standard of proficiency and decision-making. A heightened awareness will prove much more beneficial to a pilot than developing a fear of flying!
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91
