search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MY 2 CENTS WORTH JUST SAY NO! By Randy Mains


Helicopter shopping and false advertising were uncovered in a recent Survival Flight Bell 407 crash resulting in three fatalities in Vinton County, Ohio, on the morning of Jan. 29, 2019 in snowy conditions. Pilot Jennifer L. Topper, 34, of Sunbury, Ohio, and flight nurses Bradley J. Haynes, 48, of London, Ohio, and Rachel L. Cunningham, 33, of Galloway, Ohio, lost their lives that morning.


After the crash, a Survival Flight printed flyer emerged on social media that advertised in part, “Our weather minimums are different, if other companies turn down the flight for weather, CALL US.”


I was not the only person shocked after reading that flyer. A flurry of concerned comments erupted from pilots and flight crew members on social media. True to its advertising, it was reported that two air ambulance companies turned down the request for that flight because of weather, while Survival Flight accepted it.


“Helicopter shopping,” or calling another flight program to see if it will accept a flight that another program turned down, is not generally accepted as good practice in the industry. Certainly, advertising that your


company will accept a flight that others have turned down due to weather because your flight minimums are different, was in this case simply untrue. It was not only false advertising, but incredibly dangerous.


The day after the Ohio crash, a pilot with the company reached out to me in a message on social media saying, “To clear the record, that flyer was approved by management.” I asked that pilot if they have lower weather minimums than other Part 135 operators. He answered in the negative. When asked if the pilots felt pressure to fly, the pilot replied, “No.”


What I found telling about the promotional flyer was that it was signed by two base clinical managers, not pilots. It sounds suspiciously like two non-aviators making false claims to drum up business, unaware of the dangerous message they were sending.


This brings up a point: every team member in an organization, from top management on down, must fully understand the effect their action or inaction has on the safety of a flight, which is a mantra I teach in my CRM and AMRM classes, where a team member is defined as anyone who can have an influence on the safety of a flight. I doubt the people who created this flyer, which was signed off by management, were aware of the danger and pressure they were putting on their flight crews.


Because pilots and crewmembers are the last line of defense in preventing an accident, in my January 2014 column I offered “Four Mental Tools to Keep You Alive” that bear repeating. The first tool is the En route Decision Point (EDP) used by the National EMS Pilots Association. “Down by 30” is the mantra for that tool. If you find that due to meteorological conditions, you are decelerating 30 knots less than your cruising speed, or if you find you are flying below 500 feet of your minimum obstruction altitude during the night or 300 feet during the day, it’s like hitting a minimum descent altitude (MDA) or a decision altitude (DA)


8 Mar/Apr 2019


on an instrument approach. It’s time to either turn around, land, or if comfortable and able, climb and request IFR handling. But You Do Not Continue!


The second tool is the “This is Stupid” tool. If you find yourself thinking, or one of your passengers or crewmembers say out loud, “This is stupid,” the same applies as if you have hit an en route decision point. Time to call it quits and go home.


The third tool is derived from something Lyn Burks, the editor-in-chief of this magazine, told members attending a HeliSuccess conference in Las Vegas one year. His statement is very similar to the en route decision point endorsed by the National EMS Pilot’s Association. He told the audience that when he began flying HEMS he was told by a senior HEMS pilot that, “If in cruise flight you find yourself lowering the collective once while proceeding on a flight, consider that a yellow flag that all is not well. Be careful and increase your vigilance. Then, if you lower the collective a second time, that’s it. It’s time to abort the mission.” Lyn’s advice follows on from what you would do if you hit the en route decision point touted by NEMSPA.


The fourth and final tool came from HAI president Matt Zuccaro. Fed up with reading NTSB helicopter accident reports, he wrote an article featured in several aviation publications titled, “Land the Damn Helicopter.” Here is what Zuccaro said and it is well worth repeating:


“I once spoke to a pilot who had survived an accident and asked why he hadn’t used his option to make a precautionary landing. He indicated he had not given it direct consideration and had focused instead on destination and mission completion. He admitted, though, that in the past he had worried about the scrutiny he would incur for making a precautionary landing.


“Pilots normally associate precautionary landings with the police showing up, their company incurring logistical and legal


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90