SAFETY FIRST Safety-Related Information and Resources from the Vertical Aviation Safety Team


WIRE STRIKE ACCIDENTS ARE TOP CONCERN FOR AERIAL APPLICATORS


By Scott Bretthauer, director of policy, education and safety, National Agricultural Aviation Association


Wire-strike accidents consistently rank as one of the top causes of both total and fatal agricultural aviation accidents. A review by the National Agricultural Aviation Association (NAAA) of ag aviation wire-strike accidents from 2017 to 2021 revealed that 54% of the accidents involved helicopters. For reference, according to the latest FAA GA survey data, helicopters represent 23% of the total ag aviation fleet and 20% of the hours flown while conducting aerial applications. Regarding the location of the wires that were struck, 62% of the time the wire was above the field receiving the application while 38% of the time the wire was located along the edge of the field.


The slower speed and maneuverability of helicopters compared to fixed-wing aircraft make them well suited for working around wires and other obstructions. However,


that


does not make them immune from these obstructions. While the performance of a helicopter may tempt you to get close to obstacles to treat every part of a field, do not let this temptation


lead you into an accident. Maintain a safe distance from all obstacles, and remember the adage that just because you can doesn’t mean you should. If a customer asks you to spray a field that you aren’t comfortable with because of wires or other obstructions, say no.


Experience is often considered to be a factor that leads to reduced risk for having an accident, but 69% of the pilots who had a wire strike had more than 2,500 hours total time, and 22% of the pilots had more than 15,000 hours total time. Where limited experience seemed to play a role was their time in the type of aircraft involved in the accident; 39% of pilots had less than 500 hours in the type of aircraft in which they struck a wire.


You must conduct a thorough reconnaissance of the application site


to scout for poles, hardware and other


signs of wires, towers and any type of obstruction. It’s recommended you make two complete reconnaissance orbits around the application site


in opposite directions


instead of just one. The second orbit in the opposite direction will give you a different point of view and a better chance of seeing potential hazards. It is critical for you conduct follow- up reconnaissance orbits before trimming up a field, anytime you change swath directions, or if you return to a job after a pause.


Do not let your familiarity with a field convince you that reconnaissance is unnecessary. Just because you’ve already sprayed a field earlier in the year doesn’t mean a new wire or obstruction hasn’t been placed in your path. And vegetation growth can shroud guy-wire anchor points that were clearly visible earlier in the season.


As noted in a recent “Rotor Daily” story, aerial applicators


frequently collide with wires they were aware of. Since you scout for wires at the beginning of the application, at some point they can easily be lost from your short-term memory as other application tasks occupy your thoughts. It is critical that you have an active mental/verbal system in place to prevent short-term memory loss of wires.


NAAA urges all aerial applicators, both helicopter and fixed wing, to attend the “Flying


in the Wire-and-Obstruction


Environment” course presented by utility and aviation specialists. The course is available at NAAA’s Ag Aviation Expo and HAI Heli-Expo. This course can save your life.


18


Nov/Dec 2023


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84