search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MANAGEMENT


to improve coordination across organisational boundaries. People who draw on care and support often


interact simultaneously with GPs, community nursing teams, therapists, pharmacists, hospitals, local authority commissioners, advocates and voluntary organisations. Families frequently become the default coordinators between these services. While providers cannot eliminate organisational


fragmentation, they can reduce its impact by establishing clear communication routines, sharing information proactively where appropriate, clarifying responsibilities and ensuring residents and relatives understand what has been agreed after multi-disciplinary meetings.


Communication is central Our inequities research repeatedly found that participants valued professionals who listened, explained clearly and treated them with kindness and respect. Conversely, impersonal processes, inconsistent information and poor communication left people feeling confused, disempowered and less likely to seek further support. This includes understanding communication


preferences, providing accessible formats, using language that is inclusive and reflects the broad array of lived experiences, providing non-digital routes and ensuring translation and interpretation needs can be met. The aim is not to oversimplify a complex system, but to reduce the cognitive


burden placed on individuals and families who are often engaging with care at points of stress or vulnerability.


Good care is relational Most importantly, our inequity research shows that people consistently described good care in terms of being listened to, understood, treated as an individual and supported by people who knew them well. Continuity reduced the burden of repeatedly explaining needs, increased trust and strengthened people’s sense of dignity and control. Inequity is often experienced through everyday


interactions: uncertainty about where to turn, repeated explanations, fragmented communication and the exhausting work of coordinating services. At the same time, our research demonstrates that relatively small relational improvements (continuity, trusted relationships, clear communication and proactive support, for example) can significantly improve people’s experiences. For care providers, acting as trusted guides


rather than simply providers of care, you can reduce navigation burden, strengthen trust and deliver the more relational, person-centred and equitable care.


Scan here to read the full care inequities report and access more resources in the SCIE care equity evidence hub.


Gerard Crofton-Martin


Gerard is the Interim Chief Executive of the Social Care Institute for Excellence, and was previously SCIE’s Director of Transformation and Improvement, overseeing its innovative consultancy support and expert training. He has over 25 years experience working in the statutory and charity sector, and over 20 years in health and social care, including roles as Director of Quality and Evidence at Healthwatch England/ Care Quality Commission, and Director of Strategy, Impact and Transformation at Independent Age.


THE CARE HOME INDUSTRY HANDBOOK 2027 17


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88