MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
a statistical approach that allows for the incorporation of prior knowledge or beliefs into the analysis. It is used to model the uncertainty associated with qualitative test results and provides a framework for assessing the performance of these tests.
Bayes’ theorem approach The statistics involved in Bayes’ theorem can be challenging at first. Conceptually though, it aligns with how we think in clinical laboratories. By incorporating prior knowledge (from clinical presentation) and updating the data we have (through laboratory tests results) we update our conclusions. Bayes’ theorem allows for a more accurate and personalised assessment of the probability of a particular condition, helps in making more informed decisions, and provides a systematic and transparent framework for decision-making.
In the context of qualitative analysis, Bayes’ theorem can be used to calculate the probability of a specific condition given a positive test result. By considering the sensitivity and specificity of the assay, as well as the prevalence of the condition, the measurement uncertainty is quantified by the PPV. This method allows laboratories to easily quantify the uncertainty associated with qualitative
In the context of qualitative analysis, Bayes’ theorem can be used to calculate the probability of a specific condition given a positive test result. By considering the sensitivity and specificity of the assay, as well as the prevalence of the condition, the measurement uncertainty is quantified by the PPV
results and provides a practical approach for clinical decision-making.1 The key weakness of Bayes’ theorem is that it does not consider an individual measurement and assumes a fixed uncertainty value that does not account for the variability or fluctuations in individual test results. This can lead to reduced accuracy in determining the correct result, especially when dealing with samples close to the limit of detection. It also requires prior probabilities, such as sensitivity, specificity and prevalence. If these probabilities are not known or difficult to estimate accurately, it can affect the accuracy of the measurement uncertainty calculation.
Uncertainty of proportions The concept of uncertainty of proportions has been suggested to assess the uncertainty in qualitative results and may have utility in the clinical laboratory. It provides a measure of the likelihood that the sensitivity or specificity agrees with the population used for manufacturer validation. It is calculated using a 95% confidence interval for clinical sensitivity and clinical specificity using the Wilson approach discussed in CLSI EP12-A2.4 The Wilson score method is a statistical method used to calculate confidence intervals for proportions. It uses sample size and observed proportions to calculate the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval.
Lab automation from the brand you trust
Experience walk away osmolality testing with the OsmoPRO® Multi-Sample Osmometer
Say goodbye to manual CSF cell counts with the GloCyte® Automated CSF Cell Counter
Achieve unrivaled reliability of anaerobic, microaerophilic, and capnophilic environments with the Anoxomat® Anaerobic Jar System
Simplify pipette performance management with the Artel PCS® Pipette Calibration System
Revolutionize
workflow efficiency in your lab
WWW.PATHOLOGYINPRACTICE.COM AUGUST 2024 P&P 1/2 page ad
ver2.indd 1 4/10/24 12:39 PM
25
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52
