search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Orthopaedic surgery


microbial carrying particles (MCP) or colony- forming units (CFU) per square metre per hour, or commonly expressed as colonies/90mm plate/hour. There are several advantages to using settle


plates in theatres: l Skilled personnel are not required l Small and portable l Simple to measure MCP settling on instrument trolleys


l Simple to measure MCP settling close to the wound


Despite their advantages, one downside of using settle plates is that they are generally packaged in ways that are not conducive to surgical settings. They typically require sterile scissors to open, posing contamination risks, and making them less convenient to use routinely.


Testing use in UCA theatres: A pilot study Orthopaedic surgeon Andrew Thomas from The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, led a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of monitoring ultra clean air (UCA) theatres used for joint replacement surgery, and hybrid facilities used for orthopaedics and vascular surgery, using settle plates instead of traditional volumetric samplers. The study highlighted the ease of using settle


plate counting over traditional slit samplers and also noted that the correlation between volumetric counts and surface counts is already reasonably well established. Audit standards for UCA theatres are set by the Healthcare Infection


Fig 3. Peel apart pack of settle plates designed to simplify sterile deployment Society (HIS) in the UK,10 für Normung (DIN) in Germany11


the Deutsches Institut and the Svenska


institutet för standarder in Sweden (SIS).12 In conventional turbulently ventilated


theatres, HIS guidelines allow a maximum volumetric count of 180 CFU/m3 to 11.2 colonies/90mm plate/hour,10


, corresponding while


the DIN 1946 class 1b standard specifies 6.3 colonies/90mm plate/hour.11 For UCA theatres, HIS guidelines specify a maximum volumetric count of 10 CFU/m3 corresponding to 1.7 colonies/90mm plate/


,


hour, with an optimal standard of 1.0 CFU/m3 corresponding to 0.4 colonies/90mm plate/ hour.10,13


colonies/90mm plate/hour11


The DIN class 1a standard is set at 1.3 and the Swedish


SIS-TS 39 standard at 1.1 colonies/90mm plate/ hour.12


Nevertheless, these standards are not


particularly challenging, as Charnley achieved a remarkable standard of 0.2 colonies/90mm plate/hour in his 1972 study.7 In support of the study investigating the


relationship between microbiological quality of operating theatre air and infection rate, Cherwell, as cleanroom microbiology solutions specialists, collaborated with Andrew Thomas to develop a new peel apart pack settle plate product. These overcame the aforementioned packaging issues and simplified deployment by removing the need for scissors to open them.14 During the pilot study, peel apart packs of


10 plates were aseptically distributed in the theatres, mostly on the instrument trolleys, with two plates placed next to the wound in a total hip replacement, or on the lower abdomen in a total knee replacement procedure. The pilot study in UCA theatres developed a successful monitoring method and found it was possible across multiple theatres to easily meet and exceed the DIN 1a quality standard in routine practice.14


The study concluded that


the HIS recommendation of a maximum of 1.7 colonies/90mm plate/hour was inadequate and should be lowered to encourage a higher air quality to be maintained. One significant result of the pilot study


Fig 2. Two settle plates exposed on an instrument trolley during a total knee replacement 60 www.clinicalservicesjournal.com I October 2024


was that some theatres exceeded the DIN Class 1a standard by a factor of 10. Achieving a


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68