search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Healthcare delivery


Moving healthcare away from hospitals


Kate Woodhead RGN DMS discusses the drive to ‘make care closer to home’ and move healthcare away from hospitals where possible. A shift in focus from illness management, to wellness and prevention will be a key aspect of the Government’s ambition – so how can this be achieved?


The new government has given a strong signal that they are going to continue the move of healthcare away from hospitals. There is, as yet, no definitive policy announcement but it seems that a shift of emphasis and resources towards the community and primary care is soon to take place. This will be a fundamental change to the structure and function of health services and is a far from simple development. In the forty years since this author began working in health, every government without fail has attempted to strengthen and promote health and well-being without very much success. The ambition to change the focus of health from illness management to wellness and prevention has not been found to be achievable – but perhaps this time, it will be different. The King’s Fund’s Making care closer to home1


cites a number of reasons why the focus has not been successful, and these include a lack of agreement about the purpose underpinning the vision for the health and care system. They suggest that the reasons for this disparity are: l Cost savings. l Reducing demand on hospitals (waiting lists, emergency admissions).


l Better experiences and outcomes for people who use health and care services.


l Improved service alignment or integration. l Developing population health and prevention at scale, including wellbeing and tackling inequalities.


As we know, the health and care system is infinitely complex with many interconnected elements, but to achieve a wholesale shift in emphasis is hugely complex, costly and will take a great deal of effort over a long period of time. The objective would be to improve healthcare outcomes for all patients and users and to deliver an improved level of care and experience to everyone who uses the services. The change cannot be about short-term gain and cost savings which many previous developments


have been focused on, but requires a complete change to the way we think about health and wellbeing. Much of the continuing focus will have to be


on developing policies and strategies which enable the consistent vision. Hospital workforce and management will need to experience community-based care and be able to integrate the service towards their new understanding. This will need to re-educate many present staff to a new way to deliver health and care. Management too will need to change their view away from the acute sector and focus clearly on community-based care. The Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) have an opportunity to do this, partnering as they do with local authorities and voluntary organisations, that are all included under the community umbrella. Services which may also be included in the ‘new’ approach may be optometry, local pharmacies and dental services. One of the specific purposes of the ICBs is to reduce health inequalities – which have received many headlines this past few years. This too, as it is such a serious issue, should be a focal point of the community-based approaches to healthcare.


Community centred practice There has been a movement for community- based health developments for many years and many of the reports and research emerged around 2015. It will remain to be seen whether the new government uses the expertise from that time or has to re-invent the wheel. Community-based approaches are not just based in the community; they are also about mobilising energy within communities, promoting equity and increasing people’s ability to focus on their own lives and health. Four different strands that have been described in the past2


are:


1. Strengthening communities – where approaches involve building on local capacities to take action together on health and social determinants of health.


2. Volunteer roles – where the approach focuses on enhancing individuals’ capabilities to provide advice, information and support or organise activities around health and well being in their or other communities.


3. Collaborations and partnerships – where approaches involve communities and local services working together at any stage of the planning cycle, from identifying needs


October 2024 I www.clinicalservicesjournal.com 15


zinkevych - stock.adobe.com


t


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68