search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Wound care


antimicrobials, ensuring clinicians can select the most appropriate dressing for each stage of healing. Healthcare procurement strategies must


move beyond default silver use and enable access to physical-mode technologies as part of standard formularies. This will make it far easier for teams to reserve silver for situations where its benefits clearly outweigh its risks, and to use bacteria-binding dressings in situations where they can control bioburden effectively without adding to antimicrobial exposure. AMR is a serious threat, and the routine


materials placed on wounds carry real consequences for patients today and for antimicrobial effectiveness tomorrow. Moving towards bacteria-binding, non-biocidal dressings represents a practical, evidence- based step in modernising wound care. It empowers clinicians to deliver safer healing, protects precious antimicrobial resources and supports a health system facing growing clinical and operational pressures. Sustainable wound care extends beyond


reducing silver use; it requires a fundamental shift in wound management. It requires the clinician to assess the wound and use active antimicrobial dressings where they deliver the greatest clinical benefit, not using them as routine. Consider leveraging physical-mode technologies to safely manage non-infected wounds to prevent infection occurring, thereby embedding antimicrobial stewardship principles into everyday practice. By doing so, the sector can safeguard patient outcomes, while preserving the long-term effectiveness of antimicrobials.


References 1. WHO (2023) Antimicrobial Resistance. https:// www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/ detail/antimicrobial-resistance (Accessed 09/01/2026)


2. Murray, Christopher J L et al. (2022) Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis The Lancet, Volume 399, Issue 10325, 629 – 6552


3. Naghavi, Mohsen et al. (2024) Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050 The Lancet, Volume 404, Issue 10459, 1199 – 1226


4. Cornely O.A et al, (2025) Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of candidiasis: an initiative of the ECMM in cooperation with ISHAM and ASM. Lancet Infect Dis. May;25(5):e280-e293.


5. Mardourian et al. (2023) Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in urine, blood, and wound pathogens among rural patients in Karnataka, India. Antimicrobial Stewardship &


40 www.clinicalservicesjournal.com I March 2026


Healthcare Epidemiology, 2023;3:e91.


6. Williamson, D. A., Carter, G. P., & Howden, B. P. (2017). Current and emerging topical antibacterials and antiseptics: Agents, action, and resistance patterns. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 30(3), 523–563


7. Rippon, M. & Rogers, A. (2025). Development of silver resistance: A focus on wound care. Wounds International, 16(2), 20–25


8. InspireMed, (2025) Health Data Analytics: Wound, Stoma, Continence [Tableau visualization] Oct 2025 (Accessed 09/01/2026)


9. Lansdown, A. B. G. (2002). Silver I: Its antibacterial properties and mechanism of action. Journal of Wound Care, 11(4), 125–130


CSJ


10. Fletcher J, Ashfield T, Donnelly J et al (2025) Antimicrobial stewardship strategies for wound management: Recommendations for the UK. London: Wounds UK


11. Dinić M, Verpile R, Burgess JL et al (2024) Multidrug resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis from chronic wounds impair healing in human wound model. Wound Repair Regen 32: 799-810


12. Edwards-Jone V, Idensohn P, Westgate S, et al (2025) Dialkylcarbamoyl Chloride coated wound dressings: An evidence review and position document. International Position Document. Wounds International


13. Ljungh A, Yanagisawa N, Wadström T (2006) Using the principle of hydrophobic interaction to bind and remove wound bacteria. J Wound Care 15(4): 175-80


14. Husmark J, Morgner B, Susilo YB, Wiegand C (2022) Antimicrobial effects of bacterial binding to a dialkylcarbamoyl chloride-coated wound dressing: an in vitro study. J Wound Care 31(7): 560-70


15. Essity (2025) Cutimed Sorbact designed with Sorbact Technology that prevents and treats wound infection. Cutimed.co.uk https://www.


cutimed.co.uk/wound-management/prevent- and-treat-infection-with-sorbact-technology (Accessed 11/01/2026)


16. NHS Supply Chain (2025) Lowering Surgical Site Infections and Readmissions in Maternity Care. www.supplychain.nhs.uk (Accessed 13/01/2025) https://www.supplychain.nhs.uk/news-article/ sorbact-film-dressing-improves-patient- experience/


17. Rippon et al. (2025) Use of DACC-coated wound dressings in the reduction of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Global Wound Care Journal. Volume: 1 Issue: 1


About the author


Ashley Clydesdale is the Brand Manager for Essity’s Wound Care portfolio and a registered nurse with over 30 years of healthcare experience. Her background spans vascular and critical care nursing, specialist continence education, and contract management within the NHS. In her current role, Ashley combines her clinical expertise with marketing to lead educational initiatives and support evidence generation that enhances wound care practice.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64