search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
AI R BORNE T RANSMI S S ION


Are hand hygiene and cleaning enough?


Carole Hallam argues that the use of air decontamination systems to improve indoor air quality should be considered as part of Trusts’ infection prevention and control strategies. She warns that hand hygiene and surface cleaning are not enough.


The burden of healthcare-associated infections (HCAI) is a major concern across the world with an estimated 8.8 million patients affected across Europe in both acute and long-term care facilities with more than half being preventable.1


Not only does HCAI


result in poor outcomes for patients in terms of morbidity and mortality and but it also has a huge cost to healthcare providers. Modelled annual costs to the NHS are in the region of £2.7 billlion2


extended length of hospital stay of up to 25 days3


and an estimated


– what else could that money be usefully spent on and how else could the hospital beds be better utilised? In addition to the costs and extended length of stay for patients with an HCAI, there is an even bigger concern around the growing incidence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). One in three microorganisms causing HCAI are resistant to at least one antibiotic making these infections harder to treat.1


an estimated 4.95 million deaths globally4 associated with bacterial AMR in 2019 there has never been a more important time to prevent HCAIs.


Therefore, the principles of infection prevention and control are an essential strategy for preventing infections and the cornerstone in combating the spread of AMR. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has seen an increase in HCAI and an overuse of antibiotics increasing the risk of AMR, so they could not be a better time review infection prevention and control practices and to act.


Principles of infection prevention and control Earlier in 2022, NHS England published the National infection prevention and control manual for England5


(NIPCM)


based on the Scottish National infection prevention and control manual. Standards for infection prevention and control are


JANUARY 2023


With


outlined within the NIPCM and include the standard precautions and transmission- based precautions with an aim to “ensure a consistent UK-wide approach to infection prevention and control”.


The standard precautions include the preventative processes to reduce the transmission of infectious agents from patients with identified infection, as well as those with unidentified sources of infection. These standard precautions should be used “by all staff, in all care settings, at all times, for all patients, whether infection is known to be present or not, to ensure the safety of those being cared for, staff and visitors in the care environment”.


Hand hygiene, personal protective equipment (PPE) and cleaning of patient equipment and the environmental surfaces are outlined within the NIPCM but, if over half the HCAIs are preventable, do we need to relook at how we manage infection


prevention and control and consider what are the gaps? Transmission based precautions are categorised into ‘contact precautions’, ‘droplet precautions’ and ‘airborne precautions’ and provide the additional precautions to be taken, dependent on how an identified infectious agent is transmitted. Confusion has arisen with SARS-CoV-2 and whether it should be classed as ‘droplet’ or ‘airborne’. These traditional transmission- based categories are now beginning to be questioned by experts across the globe and has generated some very interesting discussions with Martin Kiernan and Brett Mitchell in their Infection Control Matters Podcasts (definitely worth a listen).


Droplet v. Airborne


Airborne and droplet transmission are usually defined by the size of the expelled aerosols or droplets, with airborne aerosol


WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM l 63





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68