search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
DIGI TAL HEALTH


journey, helping ensure seamless data and patient safety at all times.


When a patient is moved, the module simply unplugs from the side of the monitor and can be used as a transport monitor. It can then be ‘plugged’ into the host monitor at the bedside, in the new location, creating efficiencies. There are fewer patient leads to disconnect, reconnect or clean. However, the pandemic brought new challenges for hospitals in the UK. As the pandemic put pressure on ICUs, there was a requirement to quickly accelerate the integration of patient monitoring devices into hospital networks to enable hospitals to expand their ICU capacity into other areas. “At the height of the pandemic, there


weren’t enough beds in ICUs. The fact that patient monitors could be integrated into the network enabled higher acuity consultants and nurses to look after more acute patients remotely. Staff who normally worked on general wards were able to access the support of more experienced colleagues in ITU,” explains John Mendonca, Mindray UK’s national account manager for digital health solutions.


“Connectivity gives clinicians better access to patient data and offers better insights, so they do not need to be at the patient bedside to access vital information. With connected technology, this data can even be accessed from the other side of the world. The data can be accessed via mobile devices or apps that run on a laptop – anywhere within a facility,” he continues. “Informatics project leads are looking to optimise workflow by integrating medical devices, so they push patient data directly into the EPR. They want to work with vendors that make this process easier. In a high acuity area, you may have numerous devices at the point of care. Hospitals are now looking for vendors that can take away the pain of trying to integrate a plethora of devices and provide a single solution – with an optimum solution, clinicians should only have to look at a single interface, instead of multiple screens,” adds Mendonca. “Connectivity of devices allows Trusts to streamline the workflow and free time to care. Data transfer from the device into the


EPR is automated; it optimises the clinical workflow and makes the data immediately available to the clinical team.” Key to achieving interoperability between medical devices and third-party EPRs is Mindray’s M-Connect solution. The system can link devices and EPR systems across entire hospitals, or individual departments one-by-one, with a range of systems that support vendor-neutral integration with networks of any size or infrastructure type. By connecting the hospital’s entire bedside monitoring network to the clinical informatics systems, the system can provide uninterrupted visibility of patient data across the entire healthcare journey. It enables clinical teams to access detailed patient information anywhere, and facilitates the sharing of medical expertise between clinicians, departments, and hospital sites. Data can be sent to workstations, viewstations, tablets, PCs and mobiles for remote patient monitoring, ensuring timely alarms and faster responses to patient deterioration. Caregivers can sit at a nursing station and see all continuous vitals, ECG reports, Early Warning Scores (EWS), alerts and a host of other parameters for hundreds


Connectivity of devices allows Trusts to streamline the workflow and free time to care. Data transfer from the device into the electronic patient record is automated; it optimises the clinical workflow and makes the data


immediately available to the clinical team. John Mendonca, Mindray UK.


44 l WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM


of patients simultaneously. M-Connect also enables ultrasound to be viewed on the same screen as patient monitoring data – clinicians no longer need to view two different screens. Less time spent checking different monitoring screens allows quicker decision making and enables caregivers to spend more time interacting directly with their patients. In the future, platforms such as this could also offer new insights that could shape care delivery. “Connecting more data sets together with a system like M-Connect, opens up huge opportunities for future research and proactive healthcare, as well as immediate benefits to patients through greater visibility and holistic data. “Once more hospitals have these large data sets in place, they can integrate the data with AI tools like trend analysis to gain a deeper understanding into the relationships between monitoring parameters,” comments Stuart Critchley, IT & connectivity product specialist, Mindray UK.


He adds that, in order to maximise the speed of integration and ensure that all Trusts receive the benefit of a fully connected system, there will need to be some standardisation of cybersecurity regulations across the NHS. “There are standards and protocols being put in place but currently the rules around safety and integrity of patient data are different from Trust to Trust. As more hospitals introduce interoperability and EPR connectivity it will mean this issue becomes more urgent,” Critchley explains. Scalability and flexibility are also


important, Mendonca points out. With M-Connect, hospitals can start with just one department with the monitoring solution for a specific ward integrated into the EPR, then


JANUARY 2023


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68