search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PE RSONAL PROT ECT IVE EQUIPMENT


New public health guidance on PPE


Public Health England has published new guidance on PPE to protect healthcare workers. Kate Woodhead RGN DMS provides an insight into the key recommendations and issues raised in the healthcare sector.


There has been an element of controversy over the guidance for personal protective equipment for NHS staff for many months, culminating, in January of this year, in a multi-organisational campaign to increase the level of facial protection available for use by healthcare staff in COVID-19 patient interactions and to review the level of ventilation in healthcare facilities. The revised guidance, which has been agreed by all the country’s Chief Medical Officers was published by Public Health England.1


It clearly identifies that the safest level of PPE to protect NHS workers is higher than has been recommended in previous iterations of the infection control and PPE guidelines for the pandemic. The guidance has been produced in the light of the best scientific evidence available currently and WHO has confirmed that it is consistent with what it recommends in circumstances and settings with the highest risk of transmission. Concerns expressed by the Royal College of Nursing (RCN)2 Association3


and the British Medical focus on the emergence


of variants of concern and increased transmissibility to patients and staff through exposure in healthcare settings. The key concerns expressed by the RCN in particular are the effectiveness of surgical face masks during direct, close proximity patient contact and they requested, in January, that the quality of ventilation in healthcare buildings be investigated. The BMA warned of the “significant and growing concerns about the role of aerosol transmission of COVID-19 in healthcare


settings” at a time when the NHS is facing unprecedented pressure. BMA council chair Dr. Chaand Nagpaul said: “Now that we have been assured that supply [of PPE] is no longer an issue, we believe guidance should be updated to take a more precautionary approach to better protect those working on the frontline.”


In an open letter to the UK Government and all the devolved nations,4


a pressure


group, ‘Fresh Air NHS’, called for support for front line healthcare workers, to take all necessary precautions to mitigate airborne transmission of SARS-Cov-2 in healthcare settings. Fresh Air NHS is a group of front line healthcare workers and supporters which has come together to campaign for better


To ensure maximum workplace risk mitigation, organisations should undertake local risk assessments based on the measures as prioritised in the hierarchy of controls.


14 l WWW.CLINICALSERVICESJOURNAL.COM


protection for healthcare workers against COVID-19.


Healthcare workers vulnerabilities It is thought that approximately 250 health and care workers have died during the pandemic from COVID-19 infection. Fresh Air NHS quotes research to support that healthcare workers (HCWs) are 3-4 times more likely to contract the disease than the general population, with risk varying according to their role in the NHS.5


Notably,


they quote, while HCWs on regular wards are significantly more likely to become infected, intensive care unit staff have 50% lower risk despite working in an environment which was historically considered to be higher risk.6


This correlates with increased


aerosol protection provided by higher grade PPE and increased air-changes in ITUs. In contrast for hospital wards, where infectious coughing patients are also cared for, current guidance does not recommend the use of respiratory-protective PPE. Air exchange is not regulated in these settings either. The inhalation of viral aerosols, whether the susceptible person is near


AUGUST 2021


©Rick Lohre - stock.adobe.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88