search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADDITIVES | COMPATIBLISERS


Compatibilisation of a PP/SEBS-blend using a tailor-made SEB-diblock copolymer Source: Fraunhofer IHB


Below: Compatibiliser selection can play a part in improving performance and processing of PC/ABS blends


Compatibilising PC/ABS Hao Duan at Chinese company Fine-Blend Com- patibilizer Jiangsu recently teamed up with Min Qi Xin from Shanghai Kumhosunny Plastics to study the effect of different compatibilisers on the properties of PC/ABS alloys. The two evaluated two compatibi- lisers consisting of a styrene-acrylonitrile-glycidyl methacrylate (SAG) terpolymer with different contents of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) – SAG-001 and SAG-005 – and styrene-acrylonitrile-maleic anhydride terpolymer (SAM) – SAM-002 – in a 70/30 PC/ABS alloy. They measured effects on mechanical properties, thermal stability and phase morphology. The tensile strength of SAG-modified and SAM-modified alloy samples (1/8-inch thick) were all higher than an unmodified PC/ABS blend, but there was little difference between them (Figure 1). Impact strength was also higher for the compatibi- lised blends, with the type and concentration of compatibiliser having a more noticeable influence – the impact strength of SAG modified blends was higher than the SAM-modified blend at the same addition level (Figure 2). In addition, the research- ers found that SAG reduced melt flow, implying that the molecular weight of the system increased.


The HDT (heat distortion temperature) also improved with the SAG-modified system (Table 1). Moreover, the phase morphology of the


SAG-modified PC/ABS alloys was much better than that of the SAM-modified system. “As a conse- quence, SAG compatibilised PC/ABS alloy showed better properties than those of SAM modified system, suggesting that the reaction between carboxylic or epoxy groups in SAG and terminal carboxyl group in PC would be the main factor to bring the enhancement in the mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of the PC/ABS alloy,” the researchers say. Polycarbonate was sourced from Honam


Petrochemical Company of Korea and ABS was purchased from Sinopec in China. The two styrene- acrylonitrile-glycidyl methacrylate (SAG) terpoly- mers, with GMA contents of 1% and 5% respec- tively, are products of Fine-Blend itself. The styrene-acrylonitrile-maleic anhydride (SAM) terpolymer (2% of MAH content) was also a Fine-Blend product. The researchers found that the tensile strength


of compatibilised PC/ABS alloy slightly increased, but the two compatibilisers barely affected the flexural strength of the system. They concluded that the reactivity between the GMA in SAG and the terminal carboxyl group of polycarbonate was the main factor for not only improving the mechanical and thermal property, but also enhancing the phase morphology of PC/ABS alloys. The full technical paper can be downloaded HERE.


http://www.compoundingworld.com/fb_sag


Engineering solutions The engineering plastics landscape contains a variety of polymers, each with its own characteristics. “Over the last decade the landscape has more or less settled and product developers nowadays are looking to upgrade or combine the current product offering,” says Ardy Doelen, Sales & Business


68 COMPOUNDING WORLD | May 2018 www.compoundingworld.com


PHOTO: SHUTTERSTOCK


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88