This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Simulations, model tests and onboard monitoring


wind and waves. Therefore, we decided to focus our research and added value for Simeon’s team on determining the performance of his yacht in real operational conditions.


Wind propelled model For this purpose a set-up was developed to model wind propelled vessels in MARIN’s Seakeeping and Manoeuvring Basin to perform a short validation, model test programme. This was followed by a more extensive calculations’ programme supported by the validation data. In this way we provided valuable input to the sailors, while the set-up, calculation methodologies and the lessons learned are applicable for wind-assisted cargo ships as well.


It should also be noted that the Volvo Ocean 65 is a ‘one-design boat’. The team receives the boat from the race organisation and is not allowed to make changes. This means that the predictions cannot be used for design changes, so you may well ask what the predictions are for?


First of all, the crew still has many different ways to sail the boat in the fastest possible manner. And because training days are limited, they will not encounter all the conditions they will face during the race to check and optimise their performance in practice. This is precisely why the predictions are used - to have a benchmark, or starting point for the best setting for each condition.


Furthermore, besides sailing fast, you should sail the best route. The work MARIN is conducting will give insight into the performance in waves, which should lead to better routing decisions.


Figure 1: Top view of winch set-up


To this end, the following work is carried out: • ReFRESCO Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations (RANS) in calm water, to have calculations with the best possible accuracy. At the same time, these calculations are too costly and time consuming to span all operational parameters.


• PANSHIP potential flow simulations in calm water to extend the parameter space covered by the ReFRESCO simulations (after a comparison with the ReFRESCO results)


• Scale model tests in waves to determine the performance, and in particular the added resistance in waves (RAW). Again, due to cost this is only done for a small number of conditions.


• PANSHIP simulations in waves to extend the parameter space as covered by the model tests.


• Onboard monitoring to validate the simulations and determine if and where corrections need to be made to the “laboratory” experiments.


• Additionally, work is planned to calculate the actual wave conditions based on the measured motions on board. This will help the crew decide on which added resistance (and associated performance) is applicable at that moment. Furthermore, the actual conditions may be used to benchmark the metocean forecasts to further optimise the routing.


The team itself complemented the above with performance analysis of all the training, preparatory races and crew monitoring.


Added value in ‘raw’ resistance In this project MARIN pushed the boundaries through extensive seakeeping tests and simulations, which also account for added resistance. A dedicated test set-up and carbon model was built to achieve a low weight of 90 kg with a length of just under 4 m, while having the (approximate) correct stability, righting moment and inertia at the same time. During the tests the canting keel could be set to various angles and the rudders were actively controlled by an autopilot. A moveable horizontal beam was fitted on the two masts to change the connection point of the winch set-up. In this way the aerodynamic centre of effort could be varied in a large range of longitudinal and vertical locations.


Figure 1 shows the winch set-up. Lines were used to apply the aerodynamic loads from the sails. The required driving force was recalculated each time-step, accounting for the following instantaneous values: • Apparent wind angle over deck • Apparent wind speed over deck • Heel • Roll velocity (estimate for roll damping)


12 report


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28