search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PHOTO: COMPANY WEBCAST


PHOTO: COMPANY WEBCAST


NEWS ▶▶▶ Webinar on feed efficiency


In a webinar broadcast on 17 March, four ex- perts shared their insights on feed efficiency and sustainability. The webinar, held in cooper- ation with Boehringer Ingelheim, was the first in a series called “The future is pork”. Speaker Professor Dr Leo den Hartog (pic- tured right), Nutreco and WUR, explained why animals are necessary in a circular food pro- duction system. He discussed new technolo- gies, including gene expression, new raw ma- terials, precision farming and rapid diagnostics. He highlighted that feed efficien- cy not only impacts feed costs but also means fewer emissions per kilogramme of protein. Secondly, Dr Saskia Bloemhof-Abma (sec- ond left), PIC, highlighted how the genetic po- tential of animals has improved the quantity and quality of weaned pigs, as well as post-weaning liveability. She gave an overview of the pillars for accelerating gain and spoke about the size and diversity of populations, measuring what matters, excelling at science and selecting for customer success. Dr Alberto Morillo Alujas (second right) of


ASF: Socio-economic impacts studied


Tests & Trials discussed how improving feed efficiency is a major objective in enhancing pig production sustainability in terms of the econ- omy and the environment. Health improve- ment, he said, leads to better feed efficiency but no population of pigs will ever be free of infectious pathogens. Rutger Jansen, DVM (left), Boehringer In- gelheim, pointed to feed being the major cost in pig production. Improvements in the health of pigs are therefore also key for sustainability. He pointed out that feed prices in Europe fluc- tuate between € 20 and € 35 per 100 kg of feed. Jansen discussed what it means when producers can reduce the feed conversion ratio and look at it economically.


On-demand: Webinar on preventing ASF


“ASF in domestic pigs can be effectively con- trolled through good biosecurity.” That conclu- sion, drawn by Dr Klaus Depner of the Frie- drich-Loeffler-Institut in Germany, was the core message of a recent webinar on African Swine Fever. The webinar was broadcast by Pig Progress in cooperation with CID Lines, an Ecolab compa- ny, on Wednesday 6 April. Dr Depner (right on the picture) kicked off the webinar with a com- prehensive overview of what ASF virus is exact- ly, sharing the latest insights into how the virus spreads – and how it does not. The still shown above illustrates well Dr Depner’s message. Compared to Classical Swine Fever and Foot- and-Mouth Disease, ASF has low contagious- ness. Yet it has a severe course and high impact. Dr Depner pointed to the role humans play in the spread of the virus. He also added that as long as there is no vaccination, biosecurity is the best way to get the virus under control. The next speaker was Elien Claeys (left), product manager global animal health at CID


Lines. Her key message revolved around the fact that biosecurity shortcomings are critical for virus introduction on farms. She summed up a range of different aspects where biosecu- rity flaws could occur, for example, at the pur- chase of pigs, with feed and water, entrance hygiene, vermin, carcass disposal, materials, transport, depopulation and cleaning and dis- infection. She advised keeping four key mes- sages in mind: all the aforementioned different routes are important; clear and visible hygiene rules and instructions are essential; specific materials for both farms and barns are needed; and movement on farms, relating to people as well as to transport, must be limited.


Researchers have zoomed in on the socio-eco- nomic effects of African Swine Fever (ASF) on small-scale pig farming communities and value chains in the Philippines. A multidiscipli- nary team of researchers applied participatory tools (focus group discussions, informant interviews and network mapping activities) to gather data to determine the socio-economic and livelihood impact of ASF on the archipel- ago. Their findings were published in the jour- nal Frontiers in Veterinary Science. According to the researchers, the significant emotional attachment of Filipino farmers to their pigs is under-reported and has not been part of the discussion on ASF in the Philippines. The researchers found that communities dif- fered in their underlying vulnerability to liveli- hood stressors associated with ASF. The results of this study demonstrated that communities with underlying vulnerabilities – such as sea- sonal changes in income, livestock diseases and natural disasters – can be impacted heavi- ly by ASF. In addition to seasonal vulnerabili- ties, biosecurity remains a major challenge for smallholder farming systems globally, render- ing them more vulnerable to infectious diseas- es than large-scale production systems with higher biosecurity standards. Also contributing to the vulnerability context, farmers faced additional ongoing challenges in pig production, including high feed prices, no or limited informal credits provided by input suppliers, low live weight prices from traders, and high vaccine prices. Relationships between animal health workers and farmers were put under significant strain during depopulation campaigns following ASF outbreaks.


▶ PIG PROGRESS ONLINE


PigProgress @PigProgress company/pigprogress pigprogress


▶ PIG PROGRESS | Volume 38, No. 3, 2022 65


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68