search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PHOTO: FRAMELCO


PIGLET HEAL ▶▶▶TH


In order to re- duce the effect of E. coli in weaner pigs, a combination of strategies is recommended.


is required. However, as the solution seems to be farm-specif- ic, it remains a real challenge to come up with a solution to prevent post-weaning diarrhoea.


Problems with post-weaning diarrhoea Feed additives manufacturer Framelco has designed a farm-specific solution for a Belgian farm which is known to have problems with E. coli and post-weaning diarrhoea. The feed formulation was optimised and a crude protein level of 17% was used in both the control group and the treatment group. Piglets in the control group received therapeutic high-level zinc oxide during the first two weeks after weaning. The piglets in the treatment group received, during the first two weeks after weaning, a specific blend of alpha-mono- glycerides, hydrolysed lecithins and glycerides of butyric acid. In the following five weeks, the piglets in the control group did not receive any feed additives, whereas the piglets in the treatment group received a small amount of glycer- ides of butyric acid. After seven weeks, the average final body weight was 0.5 kg higher in the piglets receiving the farm-specific solution (see


32 ▶PIG PROGRESS | Volume 35, No. 10, 2019


Table 1). Average daily growth rate was increased by almost 3.4%. Moreover, feed intake was slightly higher in the treat- ment group, resulting in almost two points better feed con- version ratio (FCR) for the piglets in the treatment group. Un- fortunately, diarrhoea problems were not solved in either of the groups. In both groups antibiotics had to be used, but the amount of medicinal treatments in the control group was clearly higher compared to the treatment group (47.1% versus 29.2%, respectively).


Applying the treatment Although the application cost of the farm-specific solution was higher than the use of medicinal levels of zinc oxide, the performace of the piglets in the treatment group improved, as indicated by higher final body weights and improved FCR, resulting in more revenue and a positive return on investment (ROI). Based on these results one can conclude that a solution has been found to replace medicinal levels of zinc without com- promising animal performance or increasing the use of medication.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40