search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Drones expand to increase productivity Cormorant spraying drone from Tactical Robotics. Drones can’t carry large volumes of spraying fluids, so they use smaller droplets for good


coverage. This creates drift risks.


Size and carrying capacity of popular agricultural drones is definitely a limitation on output. But their dimensions are often determined by local regulations, with many countries granting varying degrees of ‘permission of operation’ depending on weight, often up to just 25kg. For operators willing to invest in the necessary training and certification required for larger capacity UAVs, there is now a growing choice of heavy haulers.


spraying regulations. In many places chemical applications are tightly controlled and in most circumstances this will require changes to products’ registered use. Drone applications will also have to comply with local regulations. For example, in the Netherlands all applica- tions can only be made with 75% drift reduc- ing nozzles or technology. Currently, in coun- tries with advanced agriculture, ground-based


One recent example is from Tactical Robotics, an Israeli aerospace com- pany partnering with crop protection company Adama to develop an ag- ricultural version of its Cormorant (pictured above). This drone has two internal rotors that enable vertical take-off and land and is powered by a 977hp engine. It has 500kg payload capacity (764kg including fuel) and can fly for 2.6 hours with a 300kg payload.


application equipment developments and product use restrictions are focused squarely on reducing drift and increasing accuracy.


Concerns about drift There are questions about the quality, efficacy and safety of applications from drones and rising unease among researchers and experts in the more ‘traditional’ spraying community.


It’s a concern shared by Tom Wolf, an inde- pendent spray expert from Canada, where pesticide applications from drones remains il- legal. “My primary concern is around spray drift,” he explains. “Low drone payloads mean they are unable to carry much liquid, so by ne- cessity they must use low application volumes to provide any sort of productivity.” The only way to provide sufficient coverage with very


▶ FUTURE FARMING | 22 May 2020 19


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68