search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
of School Transportation vote last May that overwhelm- ingly rejected a provision to require LED lighting on many exterior fixtures on school buses. Some transportation industry veterans said they were perplexed by the outcome because LEDs are recognized as superior in visibility, energy efficiency, lifespan and flexibility. NCST representatives from various states voiced con- cerned that an LED requirement for “all exterior body/ chassis lighting with the exception of head/park/turn combination assemblies” could carry a financial impact or would handcuff districts to LEDs even if future tech- nology proves to be a better option. Kissell, Hawkins and Ragunathan said incandescent


lights can’t hold a candle to the visibility projected by LEDs on a bus exterior. Brett Kuchciak, First Light’s specification and compliance manager, said last year that a Canadian Standards Associ- ation committee was continuing to work on standardizing LED lights under the voluntary CSA D250 standard. “Despite the NCST [proposal] not going forward, we think it’s some-


thing beneficial for the safety of school buses,” he said. First Light, which is one of many companies in the


competitive LED lighting market segment, funded a 15-district study to determine if fully illuminating bus stop arms are more likely to reduce illegal passings than retroreflective stop arms. Fourteen school districts reported “a measurable reduction in violations and an overall median decrease of 60.2 percent.” “With budgets in mind, our industry can understand


why transportation directors and fleet managers do factor in ROI when it comes to LED technology over incandescent lighting,” added Kuchciak. “But the safety benefit gained by having brighter, more uniform light- ing on vehicles should be all the justification needed.” Kuchciak also noted that some northern-state fleet op-


erators prefer incandescent exterior lights because their heat melts snow and ice. “It’s not something that’s widely seen as a benefit, but you’ll get the occasional shop guy who says that,” he commented in the fall. “Typically, though, something that gets hot on a school bus is not ideal. You’d rather have the safety factor of an LED light


Read about the decision by state delegates attending last year’s National Congress on School Transportation to not add a requirement for LEDs on school buses at stnonline.com/go/ot.


A BETTER UPFIT EXPERIENCE FOR YOU & YOUR CUSTOMERS


climate solutions & aftermarket bus products production capacity designed for dealer and large fleet volume


quality products & installs that protect your reputation


NOW SCHEDULING 2026 INSTALLS 34 School Transportation News • MARCH 2026


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76