AIR CARG O WEEK


WORLD AIRPORTS


HEATHROW’S THIRD RUNWAY CLEARS WAY AMID MOTORWAY UPHEAVAL


“The decision will pave the way for the construction of a runway over the M25, a move likely to prove controversial amid concerns about the project’s complexity.”


T


he UK government has given the go-ahead to the expansion of Heathrow Airport by selecting its own third-runway proposal as the preferred option. The scheme, outlined by Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL), foresees substantial infrastructure work - including rerouting the M25 motorway


- and would boost passenger capacity to around 150 million a year. Ministers argue the runway would underpin economic growth, improve global connectivity and deliver thousands of jobs, though the plan remains subject to a formal planning process and wide environmental scrutiny. The British Airline Pilots’ Association (BALPA) has welcomed


the government’s decision to award the contract to build a third runway at Heathrow. BALPA also called on the government to think creatively about pilot training now to ensure maximum benefits of this expansion in the future. The union, which represents over 10,000 pilots across the UK,


is calling for the government to ensure the country has enough UK- trained pilots by the time the new runway and terminal are built. Joji Waites, BALPA Director for Flight Safety, Policy and


Regulation, said: “The government’s decision to award the contract for Heathrow’s third runway today is excellent news for the UK aviation sector. Expanding Heathrow’s third runway will deliver an extra 276,000 flights to the UK every year, creating new jobs in the air and on the ground. “To really make the best of this opportunity it is essential


that the government takes steps now to ensure that we have a pipeline of trained and qualified pilots, ready to crew the new flights when they come online. “At the moment anyone who wants to be a pilot has


to invest over a hundred thousand pounds of their own money, without access to student loans, with no certainty of a job at the end. That simply prices too many young people out, who might otherwise be perfectly qualified. “The private sector has stepped up and funded


Heathrow’s expansion. Now it’s time for the government to play their part, to think creatively about the policy changes needed to make pilot training accessible to anyone who wants to fly.”


Blueprint The company’s blueprint for the landmark project


was confirmed by Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander after ministers rejected a rival bid by hotel boss Surinder Arora to build a truncated runway. Heathrow’s successful proposal calls for


the


construction of a 3,500 m strip to the north west of the current runways. The plan will cost £33m including rising


associated to £49bn including


terminals, the


upgrading of existing buildings. The decision will pave the way for the construction of


a runway over


the M25, a move likely to prove controversial


12


amid concerns about the project’s complexity. British Airways has warned recently that such a move should be avoided. While it will avoid the demolition of the village of Sipson, the


runway will extend further west than the two existing ones, crossing the M25, which will be lowered to accommodate it. Arora, who owns hotels around Heathrow, had proposed building a 2,800 m runway with a £25bn price tag that would have avoided the motorway. Airlines have also warned that Heathrow’s plan for a longer runway will make the project even more expensive. Commenting on the Government confirming Heathrow Airport


Limited’s proposal for a third runway will be used as the scheme to progress the project, John Dickie, Chief Executive of business pressure group BusinessLDN, said: “The Government’s backing for a new runway at Heathrow is vital to the UK’s competitiveness as an island trading nation. “Expansion will give businesses better connectivity to overseas


markets, boost inbound tourism and drive growth. “These plans must now move from the drawing board to delivery as


quickly as possible to unlock the full benefits for the economy. That will require regulatory decisions to move at pace, including the Civil Aviation Authority setting out how the costs for this project can be recovered to unlock the investment needed to deliver it.”


Cargo village access issues The government’s endorsement of Heathrow Airport’s third-runway proposal has placed road access to the airport’s cargo village squarely on the political and operational frontline. The chosen plan requires rerouting part of the M25 and constructing a tunnel beneath the new runway, moves that promise major engineering complexity and months - if not years - of disruptive works for freight-dependent operators. Alexander described the decision as “another important step to enable a third runway” that will drive jobs and connectivity, while stressing the scheme must meet environmental and planning tests as it progresses. For cargo operators the immediate questions are familiar but


acute: how will hauliers reach the cargo village during construction, what contingency routing will be in place for peak periods, and how will the redesign of motorway junctions affect dwell times and truck queuing? Heathrow’s proposal explicitly anticipates diversion and relocation of key roads - including a widened, reconfigured stretch of the M25 - but that promise carries two practical consequences. First, the construction footprint will temporarily reduce capacity on routes that already suffer from chronic congestion; second, longer term junction changes could reallocate traffic flows in ways that favour passenger access over freight movements, increasing the complexity of last-mile connectivity for cargo users.


Operational risks Freight industry bodies have flagged those operational risks. The British International Freight Association (BIFA) has repeatedly warned that persistent congestion at Heathrow’s cargo centre must be tackled and has established an advisory group to work with the airport on cargo redevelopment and freight management systems. “Our intention…is to allow BIFA members and other stakeholders to work with the airport authority to have a central role and be at the forefront of discussions in what needs to be addressed,” the association said when launching the group, underlining the need for


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57