search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
HAND/ARM VIBRATION AN INVISIBLE THREAT


Reactec recently supported a study into the dangers of HAVS. Here, they take us through some of their findings.


Traditional methods of assessing Hand-Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS) risk and subsequent generic control measures can help some but not all workers which can result in an underestimation of vibration exposure by up to 76%.


HAVS is caused by an over exposure to vibrations for example, when using handheld power tools. Symptoms can take time to become apparent but once evident there is no treatment to reverse the harm and quality of life impact for sufferers is extreme. Everyday activities such as pulling up a zip, holding a glass or playing games with children are affected.


Notably, the greatest errors from task-based risk assessment tend to be from the highest risk activities. This is due to tool data, commonly used in risk assessments not being representative of the risk in the field due to individual differences from user competency and tool behaviour. This was highlighted in a study involving a leading utilities company.


Supported by Reactec, the company conducted an exercise in which 14 operators deployed in small teams excavated a specific hole size using the same tool. Individuals were closely monitored with accurate real-time measurement of time of exposure and vibration magnitude during the activity. Five workers exceeded the level determined as the expected risk for the activity, and one individual, called Pete, had an exposure close to the daily maximum allowed by the regulations and six times higher than some of his colleagues. Conventional risk assessment did not predict this risk, but real-use monitoring did.


Alan Finley, a HAVS sufferer outlined the impact the disorder has had on his life: “When I first started there were no such things as monitoring or anything like that. You would grab a tool and use it. You didn’t know the consequences or what damage it was doing to you.


“I would wake up in the middle of the night with cramps. It would be like as if you had been lying on your hands and they had gone numb. Even if I picked up a little drill to do a few bits and bobs around the house, I felt the tingling and would be in constant pain.”


Harry Gardner, a Health, Safety and Environment Consultant, believes employers should go above and beyond what regulations appear to demand. He explained: “There is no such thing as a safe level of vibration, if you are working to minimum standards, you are just dicing with someone’s health. We should always be striving to achieve the lowest possible level.”


Technology can enable managers to have a heightened yet practical real-time risk assessment. More accurate tool use tracking and real time vibration exposure data improves the visibility of


26 www.tomorrowshs.com


worker exposure to vibration. By providing more representative risk data for each individual, an employer is better enabled to implement controls to reduce their employees risk.


Jacqui McLaughlin, CEO of Reactec, said: “Wearable technology like Reactec’s HAVwear enables employers to comply with the 2005 Regulations and to go further in protecting employees. HSE guidance advises that wearables are acceptable for risk assessments when used in trigger time mode, making HAVwear a viable option for those in charge of risk assessments. However, HAVwear also provides an assessment of real-tool use. Such data gives unique insights into an individual’s vibration exposure. If this shows an individual is at higher risk than the trigger time mode assessment suggests, it enables an investigation of the reasons for the increased risk and the implementation of measures to reduce exposure. Employers are then more fully meeting regulatory objectives to reduce HAVS risks as low as reasonably practicable.”


There are 2 million workers at risk of developing HAVS in the UK, and currently 300 thousand people suffering advanced stages. Yet, traditional approaches to HAV exposure management have made no impact on HAVS being consistently the highest reported industrial disease in the last five years. Notably HAVS disease- related employee claims have also been rising sharply.


Download the full report here www.reactec.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50