PROTECTING EYES & EARS
MAKING THE RIGHT SORT OF NOISE
Dougie Collin, Executive Director, Occupational Hygiene at Iqarus talks us through the varying degrees of noise monitoring and how to ensure you’re up to date with regulations.
According to the HSE, there are more than 20,000 noise-induced, work- related diagnoses reported in the UK each year. However, there are far too many examples of companies adopting poor noise management strategies.
The aim of a noise risk assessment, as required by law, is to help you decide what you need to do to ensure the health and safety of employees who are exposed to noise. It is more than just using equipment that takes measurements of noise, but this is usually the first step. The use of such equipment is not simply reading the instruction, pointing and writing down numbers. It needs to be far more coherent than that and form part of an integrated approach that audits, monitors, assesses, acts and measures.
Any element of measuring and monitoring requires a person to be competent to do so. The ‘Control of Noise at Work Regulations 2005’ require those responsible for noise measurement and monitoring to have the appropriate training and qualifications to be able to develop information, instruction and supporting guidance for their companies.
Understanding the benefits of measuring equipment is important; however, also understanding its limitations is even more significant. Knowing what it does not deliver is a fundamental element of what happens
32
when the need to risk assess is recognised. How accurate the readings need to be, is the first consideration.
For example, a Type 2 sound level meter is considered to have an accuracy of ±2 dB(A), while a Type 1 instrument has an accuracy of ±1 dB(A) - this level of accuracy is usually associated with additional functions such as octave band capability. A Type 2 meter is sufficient for general purpose mapping and verification of a particular “noise”, but nothing more detailed than that – it does not enable any octave band analysis.
The law requires that noise sources are identified, however, in a busy worksite; this is difficult to do without the use of octave band analysis. This is a fundamental element that needs to be considered as it is also used to calculate the efficiency and suitability of hearing protection. This is where companies will face some significant challenges. Not being able to achieve the level of accuracy by having inferior equipment can hinder the efficacy of a noise management strategy.
The statutory assessment and limit values within the Regulations can be determined by noise dosimeters as the primary choice, or by fractional exposure calculation built up through a combination of noise mapping and details of work patterns as additional data.
However, a combination of lack of competency and the wrong type of instrument can be disastrous and can cause noise induced hearing loss from noise at work. Progressive companies are now introducing a noise meter on site for monitoring purposes only, and are utilising expertise such as an Occupational Hygienist to provide the detail needed for compliance of all elements needed to keep the Regulator happy.
An Occupational Hygienist or a member of the Institute of Acoustics have recognised competency frameworks acceptable to the HSE and therefore ensure the best chance of managing the risks associated with noise at work. Having a noise meter to measure noise doesn’t ensure compliance if it is operated by someone who is unsure of how to use the data, or has no understanding of the calculations needed and the statutory duties associated with a noise risk assessment.
As we know, this can have a direct impact on the bottom line through lost days as well as lowering the productivity of staff. A good noise management strategy isn’t just about ‘doing the right thing’ for staff, it’s a fundamental part of business growth.
www.iqarus.com www.tomorrowshs.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58