search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INNOVATOR AWARDS FINALIST Sponsored Content


Reimagining denials prevention with predictive editing


By Linda Perryclear A


rtificial intelligence (AI) has been healthcare’s next big thing for years. While AI’s application in clinical care and pharmaceuticals has received the most buzz, the technology’s potential impact on the $43 billion spent each year on healthcare’s revenue


cycle could be equally transformative. Hospitals and health systems’ already-narrow operating


margins have been thrashed by a perfect storm of exter- nal and internal threats, including the ongoing pandemic, chronic staff shortages, rising expenses, and an inflationary economic environment. More than ever, provider organizations need to maximize


reimbursement opportunities. Unfortunately, denied claims— and the associated adjudication process—remain one of the leading causes of revenue shortfalls in provider organizations. According to a November 2022 report from Crowe LLP, a


global consulting firm, average denial rates grew from 10.2% in 2021 to 11% in 2022. Other studies show that the average cost to rework a claim is $25 and typically takes about 71 minutes. It also costs about $118 per denied claim to appeal. However, the value of the unpaid claim and the time it takes


to rework it are only part of the overall impact on a health system’s bottom line. Many provider organizations invest too heavily in reactive solutions—point technologies, staffing surges, and complex appeal processes. These tools may help “manage” denials, but true cost savings lie in prevention. Tools with AI capabilities address many of the time-consum-


ing, resource-intensive, and costly processes associated with claims editing and denial management. But the true value of this technology is its ability to analyze claims for errors before routing them to the payer. Many systems offer packaged or custom edits to claims before submission, but these edits are built retrospectively, requiring costly analysis to determine the root cause of the denials, and ongoing maintenance as payers’ adjudication rules shift in response to external forces. Telehealth claims adjudication, for example, changed rapidly during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. The ideal system would analyze claims from multiple provid-


ers, going to multiple payers, and spot trends that will likely lead to denials. Applying AI to the constantly changing stream


of data removes the manual writing and maintenance of edits and allows health systems to react to changes more quickly – before the claims are submitted and a new batch of denials has to be analyzed.


The potential of predictive editing Providers want more effective ways to identify and prevent denied claims so they can reduce administrative rework and lost revenue associated with them. Predictive editing uses an AI algorithm that focuses on the


subset of denials that are most likely to be avoidable and correctable. The algorithm’s predictive capabilities lie in its ability to analyze claims data across a broad network of pro- vider organizations, as well as policies specific to individual health plans. The solution will return the predicted Claim Adjustment Reason


and Remark (CARC & RARC) if the likelihood of denial is very high; the solution will identify the claim for user action when there is 98 percent confidence that the claim will be denied. As a result, providers can: • Reduce the administrative cost of reworking claims and


improve revenue cycle performance. • Increase edit coverage by capturing complex, payer-


specific edit scenarios that are beyond the scope of traditional front-end edit engines. • Reduce the administrative effort of maintaining manual rules. • Save on implementation costs because predictive editing


can be used within the provider’s existing edit/error manage- ment tools, especially if they use Availity’s revenue cycle solu- tion Essentials Pro. The path toward a sustainable and healthy revenue cycle


requires tools, insights, and analytics to help providers submit claims right the first time. Artificial intelligence and machine learning tools have the potential to move your organization from costly denial management to streamlined denial prevention.


Linda Perryclear is Senior Director, Product Management, at Availity. To learn more about predictive editing and other revenue cycle services, please contact her at linda.perryclear@availity.com or visit www.availity.com.


www.availity.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36