DECOMMISSIONINGSECTION TITLE
TECHNOLOGY T
Aberdeen-based expert develops innovative plugging and abandonment technology
Casing Cement
Breaker from Deep Casing Tools
says David Stephenson, DCT’s chief executive. “One company told me that it is
here is a new transformational tool that could significantly reduce the cost of decommissioning that is currently being developed by
Aberdeen-based oil and gas technology company, Deep Casing Tools (DCT), in collaboration with the Oil and Gas Technology Centre (OGTC) and Total. Te UK is expected to spend
more than £15 billion on oil and gas decommissioning over next decade, with the global figure for the same period estimated at £84 billion Plugging and abandonment (P&A) is the complex process by which a well is closed permanently and typically accounts for about 45% of projected decommissioning costs. Current technologies used for P&A – cut and pull; perforate and wash and, as a last resort, section milling – can create considerable challenges, with research revealing that around 20% of all pulling operations take longer and cost more than anticipated.
Early trials have shown that DCT’s Casing Cement Breaker, an industry first, can make these operations more predictable and reliable and can have a major impact on the length of an operation. “Early results show that up to 90% less
force is required to pull a casing following a run with the Casing Cement Breaker,”
56
www.engineerlive.com
currently taking up to 70 days to cut and pull some casing in the Norwegian North Sea. It is too early to say how much we could reduce that by, although we hope it will ultimately be 90%, but even if it were only 10% that would be a huge reduction, given rig rates of up to £350,000 a day.” DCT has a long-established record in saving time and money for oil and gas companies and reducing risk by developing a range of smart, simple and proven technologies that provide a complete solution across the drilling and completion cycle.
FROM CONCEPT TO DEVELOPMENT Te idea for this latest innovation came after a brainstorming session with an inventor and former colleague of Stephenson. “We started with some ideas, did some sketches and then built a small model tool to test the principle,” he explains. “We built a load of samples, ran the tool, and even in those early workshop tests we reduced the force required to pull a piece of casing by 90% using the Casing Cement Breaker.”
DCT then built a larger workshop
prototype and approached the OGTC for assistance. Te OGTC canvassed members and it attracted the interest of Total, which offered in-kind funding and the OGTC offered cash support. “We now have a three-way partnership with the OGTC and Total and the tool
TRANSFORMATIONAL
will be trialled on wells in Total’s Alwyn and Franklin fields in the first quarter of 2020, with the aim of it being fully commercial by the end of 2020,” reveals Stephenson. “In the meantime, Equinor carried out a trial in the Huldra field, using the workshop prototype, which confirmed the potential of what might be achieved. It reduced the force required to pull a piece of casing by about 40%, which would mean a 10-day job would take six days, and that tool had really only been designed for workshop testing. We have taken the learnings from that trial, looked at how we can make it even better, addressed those issues and are now building a second-generation prototype. “Industry involvement is important to
me. By partnering with the OGTC and Total through the development we know we will end up with a fit-for-purpose tool when we go to market,” states Stephenson. Malcolm Banks, Wells Solution
Centre Manager of the OGTC, says: “Reducing well P&A costs is a key area of the OGTC Wells Roadmap. Te Casing Cement Breaker has the potential to significantly reduce the time and cost of casing recovery to allow well barrier placement, so it is well aligned with our strategic objectives. “DCT has a proven track record
of developing and commercialising innovative ideas for the drilling and completion industry, giving us confidence they will be able to deliver on this current project.”
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
