search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURINGSECTION TITLE


when compared to traditional production methods.


While the challenge of designing


is addressed with the use of additive technology, the next step is to find a material that meets the rigid mechanical properties required for space applications. Tis is not easy research: a variety of additive technologies available on the market can produce the majority of designs, however, not all the materials for AM are appropriate. For example, some material properties could be too weak for space ready parts and structures. So selecting the right material is fundamental when opting for AM.


THE ORESAT0 CUBESAT An example case is represented by the Portland State Aerospace Society (PSAS) that built OreSat0, their very own artisanally hand-crafted CubeSat system, fully open source, modular and reusable, designed for educational teams. Tey have been a fan of additive manufacturing for some time now so the first transition to professional 3D printing was not “traumatic” for them. In this specific case, they used Fused


Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D printing until they prototyped a design that worked. Ten they switched to Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) which “worked extremely well”, say the PSAS team. Te team then faced the “real” challenge: find a SLS material to manufacture functional, flight-ready parts capable of meeting the requirements for their OreSat0 system, including minimising volume and mass, isolating systems both thermally and electrically, and be robust enough to withstand 14g random vibration


environmental testing. In particular the team needed to pack one of the OreSat’s critical subsystems, a tri-band deployable antenna system, in a volume of only 5x5x2cm. Te antenna had three separate antennas (UHF at 436.5 MHz, L band at 1.265 GHz, and L1 at 1.575 GHz) each with 4 elements; all 12 of these elements had to be deployed using nylon monofilament lines and only a single melt resistor. Metal couldn’t be used because it would detune the antennas, but most 3D printing materials weren’t up to the task of being flown in space. After researching all available materials, the team came across a composite material, glass fiber reinforced, named Windform LX3.0. “Te SLS technology combined to this material allowed us to pack so much functionality in such a tight space. We’ve never seen anything close to the packing density of this antennas system”, says Cass Bloom, a mechanical engineering student at Portland State University. He continues, “Tere was no way we would have been able to get the packing density of three bands with four elements each in anything other than a 3D printed, non- conductive process. We don’t know of any other satellite with this kind of antenna density.”


MANUFACTURING MATERIALS Te parts that PSAS decided to manufacture using SLS and glass fiber reinforced composite material, were critical for vibration and thermal performance. Tat’s why. Before the satellite is integrated into the launch vehicle, it must first pass a 3 axis, 14g random vibration test and undergo a full thermal evaluation using simulation software. Vibration inside of a rocket headed to orbit is


The star tracker used in the camera lens and sensor assembly


intense, and it is very important that nothing inside of the satellite vibrates free or worse, breaks apart. Once the


The OreSat0 internal card cage


satellite is in orbit, it is exposed to a range of sometimes intense temperatures that must be carefully considered when choosing materials to include. Te PSAS team highlight, “Te manufacturing material we chose, consistently met both of these needs, being for example able to withstand extreme thermal cycling from -40 to +100 C. It become an integral design parameter for our OreSat.” OreSat0 was deployed into low earth orbit on March 15th, 2021. PSAS planned to set OreSat0.5 for flight in October 2023, whereas they scheduled to deploy OreSat1 via the International Space Station in early 2024. Te OreSat0 main structure was made out of machined aluminum, which is a requirement of the CubeSat specification; the OreSat0 parts that PSAS decided to produce using SLS process and glass fiber reinforced composite material are, in addition to the turnstile antenna assembly: the star tracker used in the camera lens and sensor assembly; the battery assembly. PSAS’s future CubeSats have the SWIR camera lens holder and helical deployer as well 3D printed in Windform LX 3.0 glass fiber reinforced composite material.


Nathanael Baker is the Senior Project Coordinator at CRP USA. www.crp-group.com


www.engineerlive.com 15


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44