search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
19


Table 3: Extract of a compound report.


extracted glycan signals against the database attaches corresponding structures to the hits. Figure 6 shows results obtained from the Antibody Standard. The identified hits are listed in the Data Navigator pane and corresponding peaks in Chromatogram Results (here, superposition of Extracted Compound Chromatograms). The Structure Viewer illustrates the glycan structure of the selected peak. m/z values, charge states and isotopes of the selected glycan hit are displayed in MS Spectrum Results and MS Spectrum Peak List.


Reporting: Volumes of glycosylamines with identical mass are merged. The same occurs for the volumes of the free reducing end glycan isomers. Latter are multiplied with an ionisation factor that compensates for the difference in ionisation efficiency between glycosylamines and free reducing end glycans. Corresponding glycosylamines and free glycans are clustered and the total volume is reported. Volumes of free reducing end glycan entries are deleted as redundant information. Finally, glycosylamine isomers are visualised by colour coding as shown in Table 3, which shows the summary table of a compound report that usually also includes chromatograms and mass spectra.


Data processing including reporting (all performed by a single mouse click) typically needs less than 5 minutes per sample. This makes a total of about 20 minutes for an assay that traditionally could take one half to several days.


Chip stability, reproducibility and lifetime Table 4 summarises characteristics of the mAb-Glyco Chip. Retention time stability over 200 injections was in the range 0.3 to 0.5% RSD (4 chips evaluated), reproducibility of the relative abundance was typically better


Figure 6: Typical results obtained from the extraction and identification procedure using MFE and glycan database search, respectively. Sample: Antibody Standard, 75ng on-column.


Investigated Item


Retention time stability over 200 injections


Intra-day reproducibility of rel. glycan ratios


Inter-day reproducibility of rel. glycan ratios


Spray stability Chip lifetime


PNGase F activity // long-term storage


PNGase F activity // freeze/thaw cycles


# of Chips tested 4 2 2 1 10 1 2 Table 4: Performance characteristics of the mAb-Glyco Chip. Results 0.3-0.5% RSD


5% RSD on average (glycans > 1% relative ration)


7% RSD on average (glycans > 1% relative ration)


> 200 hours 200-300 injections


(75ng lgG from bovine serum (Sigma) on-column each injection)


90% remaining activity after 3 months of storage at -20o


C


83% remaining activity after 74 freeze/thaw cycles


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52